ArticleEuropean radiology2022
Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: magnetic resonance imaging characterisation of reparable lesions and correlation with arthroscopy.
Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tear location of posterior cruciate ligament tears: introduction and reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based classification.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Limited Agreement on ACL Tear Location Between Arthroscopy and MRI: A Prospective Evaluation.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Reliability of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Determining the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Location.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Reliability of Preoperative MRI in the Prediction of ACL Tear Type.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Approaching expert-level accuracy for differentiating ACL tear types on MRI with deep learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Spontaneous healing of acute ACL ruptures: rate, prognostic factors and short-term outcome.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Positional MR imaging of normal and injured knees.European radiology · 2023Article
- A deep learning approach for anterior cruciate ligament rupture localization on knee MR images.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesA recent treatment algorithm suggests that proximal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with good-to-excellent tissue quality are amenable to primary repair. Our primary objective was to assess the ability of MRI to determine the exact tear location and tissue quality, using arthroscopy as a reference standard.
methodsIn an initial sample of 71 patients with prior ACL surgery (repair or reconstruction), the diagnostic accuracy of MRI was assessed using arthroscopy as a reference standard. Each native ACL tear was graded according to Sherman's arthroscopic classifications during the surgical procedure. MRI scans were retrospectively reviewed for grading, blinded to arthroscopic findings and in consensus by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Tear location and tissue quality were graded using the MRI Sherman tear location (MSTL), MRI Sherman tissue quality (MSTQ) and simplified MRI Sherman tissue quality (S-MSTQ) classifications. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was assessed on a second sample of 77 patients. MRI classification accuracy was compared by McNemar's tests. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient.
resultsRegarding tear location, diagnostic accuracy was 70% (50/71) based on the MSTL classification. Diagnostic accuracy for tissue quality was 52% (15/29) based on the MSTQ classification and 90% (26/29) for the S-MSTQ classification (p = 0.003). Inter-observer agreement was good for MSTL (κ = 0.78) and moderate-to-good for the MSTQ and S-MSTQ classifications (κ = 0.44 and 0.63 respectively).
conclusionsMRI seems to be accurate in assessing tear location and tissue quality and may help clinicians to predict the reparability of ACL tears. KEY POINTS: • MRI seems to be accurate in assessing tear location and tissue quality and may help clinicians to predict the reparability of ACL tears. • High intra-observer agreement was demonstrated when grading the tear location into one of five types. • The diagnostic accuracy of the simplified MRI tissue quality classification, involving deletion of the ligament stump signal criterion, was better than that observed with the MRI Sherman tissue quality classification, but was moderate to good in terms of inter- and intra-observer agreement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.