Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34255127›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2021

[Organoids for the advancement of intraoperative diagnostic procedures].

N Harland, B Amend, N Lipke, S Y Brucker, F Fend, A Herkommer, H Lensch, O Sawodny, T E Schäffer, K Schenke-Layland and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N HarlandKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. niklas.harland@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
B AmendKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
N LipkeKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
S Y BruckerDepartment für Frauengesundheit, Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
F FendInstitut für Pathologie und Neuropathologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
A HerkommerInstitut für Technische Optik, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
H LenschFachbereich Informatik, Computergrafik, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
O SawodnyInstitut für Systemdynamik, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
T E SchäfferInstitut für Angewandte Physik, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
K Schenke-LaylandDepartment für Biomedical Engineering, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
C Tarín SauerInstitut für Systemdynamik, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
W AicherKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
A StenzlKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen · DEUniversity of Stuttgart · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of cancer surgery, there is always a trade-off between oncological safety and preservation of function. This is especially true in pelvic surgery due to the close relationship to the pelvic floor muscles, blood supply and nerves. Currently, risk models, preoperative imaging, the surgeon's assessment, and the intraoperative frozen section serve as the basis for decision-making. New imaging techniques and standardization in frozen section have significantly improved this in recent years. However, limitations remain due to time delays as well as more difficult correct anatomical assignment in the follow-up. Alternative intraoperative techniques may overcome this limitation in the future. Patient-derived organoids have emerged as an important new research vehicle in recent years. They are based on tumor stem cells that, under special culture conditions, form three-dimensional replicas of the original tissue. This makes them ideally suited for testing individual system therapies but also as a validation technique for new intraoperative diagnostic procedures. The Research Training Group 2543/I, which is funded by the German Research Foundation, is researching the potential of new diagnostic methods in an interdisciplinary team regarding validation in addition to intraoperative frozen sections.

Indexed as

Frozen SectionsOrganoidsHumansPelvisArtificial intelligenceAugmented realityMedical technologyProstate cancerUro-oncological surgery

Identifiers

PMID34255127
OpenAlexW3178150725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.