Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34255008›Full record

SynthesisJAMA2021

Use of Medications for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder Among US Medicaid Enrollees in 11 States, 2014-2018.

Medicaid Outcomes Distributed Research Network (MODRN), Julie M Donohue, Marian P Jarlenski, Joo Yeon Kim, Lu Tang, Katherine Ahrens, Lindsay Allen, Anna Austin, Andrew J Barnes, Marguerite Burns and 17 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Association between medication for opioid use disorder during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Medicaid Outcomes Distributed Research Network (MODRN)
Julie M DonohueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Marian P JarlenskiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Joo Yeon KimDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Lu TangDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Katherine AhrensPublic Health Program, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland.
Lindsay AllenHealth Policy, Management, and Leadership Department, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
Anna AustinDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Andrew J BarnesDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Marguerite BurnsDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Chung-Chou H ChangDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Sarah ClarkDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Evan ColeDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Dushka CraneOhio Colleges of Medicine Government Resource Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Peter CunninghamDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
David IdalaThe Hilltop Institute, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore.
Stefanie JunkerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Paul LanierSchool of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Rachel MaukOhio Colleges of Medicine Government Resource Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Mary Joan McDuffieCenter for Community Research & Service, Biden School of Public Policy and Administration, University of Delaware, Newark.
Shamis MohamoudThe Hilltop Institute, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore.
Nathan PaulyHealth Sciences Center, School of Public Health, Health Affairs Department, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
Logan SheetsAcademyHealth, Washington, DC.
Jeffery TalbertDivision of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Kara ZivinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Adam J GordonDepartment of Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Susan KennedyAcademyHealth, Washington, DC.
Research Network (United States) · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USAcademyHealth · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVirginia Commonwealth University · USHealth Affairs · USUniversity of Delaware · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Southern Maine · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Examining the quality of opioid use disorder treatment in a Medicaid research networkR01DA048029 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DONOHUE, JULIE MARIE · 2019 to 2021
$3.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is limited information about trends in the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) among Medicaid enrollees. Objective: To examine the use of medications for OUD and potential indicators of quality of care in multiple states. Design, Setting, and Participants: Exploratory serial cross-sectional study of 1 024 301 Medicaid enrollees in 11 states aged 12 through 64 years (not eligible for Medicare) with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9 or ICD-10) codes for OUD from 2014 through 2018. Each state used generalized estimating equations to estimate associations between enrollee characteristics and outcome measure prevalence, subsequently pooled to generate global estimates using random effects meta-analyses. Exposures: Calendar year, demographic characteristics, eligibility groups, and comorbidities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of medications for OUD (buprenorphine, methadone, or naltrexone); potential indicators of good quality (OUD medication continuity for 180 days, behavioral health counseling, urine drug tests); potential indicators of poor quality (prescribing of opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines). Results: In 2018, 41.7% of Medicaid enrollees with OUD were aged 21 through 34 years, 51.2% were female, 76.1% were non-Hispanic White, 50.7% were eligible through Medicaid expansion, and 50.6% had other substance use disorders. Prevalence of OUD increased in these 11 states from 3.3% (290 628 of 8 737 082) in 2014 to 5.0% (527 983 of 10 585 790) in 2018. The pooled prevalence of enrollees with OUD receiving medication treatment increased from 47.8% in 2014 (range across states, 35.3% to 74.5%) to 57.1% in 2018 (range, 45.7% to 71.7%). The overall prevalence of enrollees receiving 180 days of continuous medications for OUD did not significantly change from the 2014-2015 to 2017-2018 periods (-0.01 prevalence difference, 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.02) with state variability in trend (90% prediction interval, -0.08 to 0.06). Non-Hispanic Black enrollees had lower OUD medication use than White enrollees (prevalence ratio [PR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.81; P < .001; 90% prediction interval, 0.52 to 1.00). Pregnant women had higher use of OUD medications (PR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11-1.25; P < .001; 90% prediction interval, 1.01-1.38) and medication continuity (PR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.10-1.17, P < .001; 90% prediction interval, 1.06-1.22) than did other eligibility groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Among US Medicaid enrollees in 11 states, the prevalence of medication use for treatment of opioid use disorder increased from 2014 through 2018. The pattern in other states requires further research.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidMethadoneMiddle AgedNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID34255008
PMCPMC8278273
OpenAlexW3179112797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.