Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34254966›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational gastroenterology2021

Sensory Adaptation Training or Escitalopram for IBS With Constipation and Rectal Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Satish S C Rao, Enrique Coss-Adame, Yun Yan, Askin Erdogan, Jessica Valestin, Deepak Nag Ayyala

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Optimizing the Utility of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosis and Therapy: A Roundtable Review and Recommendations.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Review
  5. Faecal incontinence in adults.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Satish S C RaoDivision of Neurogastroenterology/Motility, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Enrique Coss-AdameDivision of Neurogastroenterology/Motility, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Yun YanDivision of Neurogastroenterology/Motility, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Askin ErdoganDivision of Neurogastroenterology/Motility, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Jessica ValestinDivision of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Deepak Nag AyyalaDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USAugusta University · USAugusta University Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRectal hypersensitivity is an important pathophysiological dysfunction in irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS-C), whose treatment remains challenging. In a randomized controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of a novel sensori-behavioral treatment, sensory adaptation training (SAT) with escitalopram.

methodsPatients with IBS-C (Rome III) with rectal hypersensitivity received 6 biweekly sessions of SAT or escitalopram 10 mg daily for 3 months. SAT was performed by repetitive gradual distension of 10-cm long highly compliant rectal balloon above tolerability thresholds using barostat. Treatment effects on sensory thresholds and symptoms were compared. Coprimary outcome measures were those achieving improvements in rectal hypersensitivity (≥20% increase in ≥2/3 sensory thresholds) and pain (≥30% decrease).

resultsWe randomized 49 patients; 26 received SAT and 23 escitalopram. SAT significantly improved desire to defecate (Δ 13.5 ± 2.3 vs 2.2 ± 1.1 mm Hg, P = 0.0006) and maximum tolerability (Δ 14.8 ± 1.9 vs 1.6 ± 0.9 mm Hg, P < 0.0001) thresholds compared with escitalopram. There were significantly greater percentage of hypersensitivity responders with SAT than escitalopram (69% vs 17%, P < 0.001), but not pain responders (58% vs 44%, P = 0.4). Daily pain scores did not differ between groups (P = 0.8) or escitalopram (P = 0.06) but decreased with SAT (P = 0.0046) compared with baseline. SAT significantly increased rectal compliance (P < 0.019) and complete spontaneous bowel movements per week than escitalopram (P = 0.04). Five withdrew from adverse events with escitalopram and none with SAT. DISCUSSION: SAT was significantly more efficacious in improving hypersensitivity and bowel symptoms in IBS-C than escitalopram. SAT is a promising novel treatment for IBS with rectal hypersensitivity.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryAbdominal PainAdultConstipationEscitalopramHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRectumSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSensory ThresholdsTreatment OutcomeEscitalopramSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34254966
PMCPMC8280059
OpenAlexW3179129880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.