Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34254900›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Predictive factors of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma.

Melissa Sarver, Michael C Brown, Kristen E Rhodin, April K S Salama, Georgia M Beasley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Editorial of special focus on melanoma immunotherapy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melissa SarverDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael C BrownDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Kristen E RhodinDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
April K S SalamaDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Georgia M BeasleyDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6387-9030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review describes the current body of literature and ongoing clinical trials examining neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for patients with resectable stage III and IV melanoma. Based on prior success in treating metastatic melanoma and as adjuvant therapy, ICIs are being explored in the neoadjuvant setting. There have been initial trials and there are many ongoing trials examining neoadjuvant ICI. Herein, we will review the clinical feasibility and efficacy of various neoadjuvant ICI regimens, explore pathologic and cellular responses, and present factors associated with predictive tumor response.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaCombined Modality TherapyHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsimmune therapylymph nodesMelanomaneoadjuvant

Identifiers

PMID34254900
PMCPMC9122309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.