Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34254878›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2022

A comparison of epithelial cell content of oral samples estimated using cytology and DNA methylation.

Yen Ting Wong, Michael A Tayeb, Timothy C Stone, Laurence B Lovat, Andrew E Teschendorff, Rafal Iwasiow, Jeffrey M Craig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Fanconi Anemia as a Window into Premalignant Field Cancerization of the Oral Mucosa.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Impact of Early Life Adversity on Peripubertal Accelerated Epigenetic Aging and Psychopathology.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yen Ting WongIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Michael A TayebDNA Genotek Inc., Ottawa, Canada.
Timothy C StoneDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK.
Laurence B LovatDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK.
Andrew E TeschendorffCAS Key Lab of Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, PR China.
Rafal IwasiowDNA Genotek Inc., Ottawa, Canada.
Jeffrey M CraigIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3979-7849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saliva and buccal samples are popular for epigenome wide association studies (EWAS) due to their ease of collection compared and their ability to sample a different cell lineage compared to blood. As these samples contain a mix of white blood cells and buccal epithelial cells that can vary within a population, this cellular heterogeneity may confound EWAS. This has been addressed by including cellular heterogeneity obtained through cytology at the time of collection or by using cellular deconvolution algorithms built on epigenetic data from specific cell types. However, to our knowledge, the two methods have not yet been compared. Here we show that the two methods are highly correlated in saliva and buccal samples (R = 0.84, P < 0.0001) by comparing data generated from cytological staining and Infinium MethylationEPIC arrays and the EpiDISH deconvolution algorithm from buccal and saliva samples collected from twenty adults. In addition, by using an expanded dataset from both sample types, we confirmed our previous finding that age has strong, non-linear negative correlation with epithelial cell proportion in both sample types. However, children and adults showed a large within-population variation in cellular heterogeneity. Our results validate the use of the EpiDISH algorithm in estimating the effect of cellular heterogeneity in EWAS and showed DNA methylation generally underestimates the epithelial cell content obtained from cytology.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenomicsAdultChildCpG IslandsEpigenesis, GeneticEpithelial CellsGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLeukocytesBuccalcell-type heterogeneitycytologyDNA methylationepithelial cellEWASsaliva

Identifiers

PMID34254878
PMCPMC8920143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.