Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34254836›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reviews2022

Microcircuits for spatial coding in the medial entorhinal cortex.

John J Tukker, Prateep Beed, Michael Brecht, Richard Kempter, Edvard I Moser, Dietmar Schmitz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Distinct brain regions map olfactory and visual spaces.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

John J TukkerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4394-199X
Prateep BeedNeuroscience Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humbold-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael BrechtBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Richard KempterInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5344-2983
Edvard I MoserEinstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dietmar SchmitzGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2741-5241
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DENorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hippocampal formation is critically involved in learning and memory and contains a large proportion of neurons encoding aspects of the organism's spatial surroundings. In the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC), this includes grid cells with their distinctive hexagonal firing fields as well as a host of other functionally defined cell types including head direction cells, speed cells, border cells, and object-vector cells. Such spatial coding emerges from the processing of external inputs by local microcircuits. However, it remains unclear exactly how local microcircuits and their dynamics within the MEC contribute to spatial discharge patterns. In this review we focus on recent investigations of intrinsic MEC connectivity, which have started to describe and quantify both excitatory and inhibitory wiring in the superficial layers of the MEC. Although the picture is far from complete, it appears that these layers contain robust recurrent connectivity that could sustain the attractor dynamics posited to underlie grid pattern formation. These findings pave the way to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying spatial navigation and memory.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsEntorhinal CortexHippocampusHumansLearningNeuronsPyramidal Cellsconnectivityentorhinal cortexgrid cellsmicrocircuitsnavigation

Identifiers

PMID34254836
PMCPMC8759973
OpenAlexW3182016269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.