Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34254343›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2021

Workplace improvements to support safe and sustained return to work: Suggestions from a survey of workers with permanent impairments.

Jeanne M Sears, Amy T Edmonds, Ellen MacEachen, Deborah Fulton-Kehoe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeanne M SearsDepartment of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7325-1279
Amy T EdmondsDepartment of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ellen MacEachenSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6477-7650
Deborah Fulton-KehoeDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · USUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

University of Washington Education and Research CenterT42OH008433 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER D · 2005 to 2024
$29.4M
Keys to Re-Injury Prevention and Sustained Return-to-Work for Disabled WorkersR21OH011355 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SEARS, JEANNE M. · 2018 to 2019
$427k
ACL HHS R21OH011355ACL HHS T42OH008433NIOSH CDC HHS R21 OH011355NIOSH CDC HHS R21OH011355NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008433NIOSH CDC HHS T42OH008433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoughly 10% of occupational injuries result in permanent impairment. After initial return to work (RTW), many workers with permanent impairments face RTW interruption due to reinjury, unstable health, disability, and layoff. This study used open-ended survey data to: (1) explore workplace factors identified by workers as important levers for change, some of which may previously have been unrecognized; and (2) summarize workers' suggestions for workplace improvements to promote sustained RTW and prevent reinjury.

methodsThis study included data from workers' compensation claims and telephone surveys of 582 Washington State workers who had RTW after a work-related injury involving permanent impairment. The survey was conducted in 2019, about a year after claim closure. We used qualitative content analysis methods to inductively code open-ended survey responses.

resultsThe most frequent themes were: safety precautions/safer workplace (18.1%), adequate staffing/appropriate task distribution (16.2%), and safety climate (14.1%). Other frequent themes included ergonomics, rest breaks, job strain, predictability and flexibility in work scheduling practices, employer response to injury, social support, communication, and respect. Many workers reported that they were not listened to, or that their input was not sought or valued. Workers often linked communication deficiencies to preventable deficiencies in safety practices, safety climate, and RTW practices, and also to lack of respect or distrust. In counterpoint, nearly one-third of respondents reported that no change was needed to their workplace.

conclusionsPolicies and interventions targeting worker-suggested workplace improvements may promote safe and sustained RTW, which is essential for worker health and economic stability.

Indexed as

Occupational InjuriesReturn to WorkEconomic StabilityHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkers' CompensationWorkplacejob strainoccupational injuriespermanent impairmentpermanent partial disabilityreturn to worksafety climatesocial supportunemploymentworkers' compensationworkplace

Identifiers

PMID34254343
PMCPMC8362688
OpenAlexW3182267416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.