Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34254290›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of botany2021

Reconstructing Dipsacales phylogeny using Angiosperms353: issues and insights.

Aaron K Lee, Ian S Gilman, Mansa Srivastav, Ariel D Lerner, Michael J Donoghue, Wendy L Clement

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of botany, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Phylogenomics of the pantropical Connaraceae: revised infrafamilial classification and the evolution of heterostyly.Plant systematics and evolution = Entwicklungsgeschichte und Systematik der Pflanzen · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aaron K LeeDepartment of Biology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, 08628, USA.
Ian S GilmanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Mansa SrivastavDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Ariel D LernerDepartment of Biology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, 08628, USA.
Michael J DonoghueDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Wendy L ClementDepartment of Biology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, 08628, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5335-1013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premisePhylogenetic relationships within major angiosperm clades are increasingly well resolved, but largely informed by plastid data. Areas of poor resolution persist within the Dipsacales, including placement of Heptacodium and Zabelia, and relationships within the Caprifolieae and Linnaeeae, hindering our interpretation of morphological evolution. Here, we sampled a significant number of nuclear loci using a Hyb-Seq approach and used these data to infer the Dipsacales phylogeny and estimate divergence times.

methodsSampling all major clades within the Dipsacales, we applied the Angiosperms353 probe set to 96 species. Data were filtered based on locus completeness and taxon recovery per locus, and trees were inferred using RAxML and ASTRAL. Plastid loci were assembled from off-target reads, and 10 fossils were used to calibrate dated trees.

resultsVarying numbers of targeted loci and off-target plastomes were recovered from most taxa. Nuclear and plastid data confidently place Heptacodium with Caprifolieae, implying homoplasy in calyx morphology, ovary development, and fruit type. Placement of Zabelia, and relationships within the Caprifolieae and Linnaeeae, remain uncertain. Dipsacales diversification began earlier than suggested by previous angiosperm-wide dating analyses, but many major splitting events date to the Eocene.

conclusionsThe Angiosperms353 probe set facilitated the assembly of a large, single-copy nuclear dataset for the Dipsacales. Nevertheless, many relationships remain unresolved, and resolution was poor for woody clades with low rates of molecular evolution. We favor expanding the Angiosperms353 probe set to include more variable loci and loci of special interest, such as developmental genes, within particular clades.

Indexed as

CaprifoliaceaeDipsacalesEvolution, MolecularFossilsPhylogenyAdoxaceaeCaprifoliaceaedivergence timesfossilsHeptacodiumHyb-SeqMorinoideaephylogenomicstarget enrichmentZabelia

Identifiers

PMID34254290
PMCPMC8362060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.