ArticleAmerican journal of botany2021
Settling a family feud: a high-level phylogenomic framework for the Gentianales based on 353 nuclear genes and partial plastomes.
Article in American journal of botany, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous Inference of Flora-Wide Nuclear and Plastid Phylogenies Using Angiosperms353 Sequence Capture Data.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Resolving relationships in the radiation of Australia's largest pea clade (Fabaceae tribe Mirbelieae) with target-capture sequencing.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- An updated phylogeny of Boraginales based on the Angiosperms353 probe set: a roadmap for understanding morphological evolution.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- Article
- Conservation Implications for the Iberian Narrow EndemicEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Homospermidine synthase evolution and the origin(s) of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Apocynaceae.American journal of botany · 2025Article
- A near-complete genome assembly of Cinchona calisaya.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Australian Rainforests-A Living Museum of Natural Product Chemical Diversity.Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products · 2025Review
- Apocynaceae wood evolution matches key morphological innovations.American journal of botany · 2024Article
- Phylogenomic insights into NeotropicalHeliyon · 2024Article
- Complementing model species with model clades.The Plant cell · 2024Review
- Evolution and diversification of carboxylesterase-like [4+2] cyclases in aspidosperma and iboga alkaloid biosynthesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Phylogenomics and topological conflicts in the tribe Anthospermeae (Rubiaceae).Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Article
- Metagenomics of AfricanPeerJ · 2023Article
- Easy353: A Tool to Get Angiosperms353 Genes for Phylogenomic Research.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Phylogenomic and comparative analyses of Coffeeae alliance (Rubiaceae): deep insights into phylogenetic relationships and plastome evolution.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- A highly contiguous, scaffold-level nuclear genome assembly for the fever tree (GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2022
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
premiseComprising five families that vastly differ in species richness-ranging from Gelsemiaceae with 13 species to the Rubiaceae with 13,775 species-members of the Gentianales are often among the most species-rich and abundant plants in tropical forests. Despite considerable phylogenetic work within particular families and genera, several alternative topologies for family-level relationships within Gentianales have been presented in previous studies.
methodsHere we present a phylogenomic analysis based on nuclear genes targeted by the Angiosperms353 probe set for approximately 150 species, representing all families and approximately 85% of the formally recognized tribes. We were able to retrieve partial plastomes from off-target reads for most taxa and infer phylogenetic trees for comparison with the nuclear-derived trees.
resultsWe recovered high support for over 80% of all nodes. The plastid and nuclear data are largely in agreement, except for some weakly to moderately supported relationships. We discuss the implications of our results for the order's classification, highlighting points of increased support for previously uncertain relationships. Rubiaceae is sister to a clade comprising (Gentianaceae + Gelsemiaceae) + (Apocynaceae + Loganiaceae).
conclusionsThe higher-level phylogenetic relationships within Gentianales are confidently resolved. In contrast to recent studies, our results support the division of Rubiaceae into two subfamilies: Cinchonoideae and Rubioideae. We do not formally recognize Coptosapelteae and Luculieae within any particular subfamily but treat them as incertae sedis. Our framework paves the way for further work on the phylogenetics, biogeography, morphological evolution, and macroecology of this important group of flowering plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34254285What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.