Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34254270›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2022

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cesarean Delivery and Indications Among Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Women.

Ijeoma C Okwandu, Meredith Anderson, Debbie Postlethwaite, Aida Shirazi, Sandra Torrente

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Ethnicity and Migration in Perinatal Inequalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cesarean Section Rates and Mobile Health's Role in Equitable Access to Prenatal Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ijeoma C OkwanduDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Ijeoma.okwandu@kp.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5271-3876
Meredith AndersonDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Debbie PostlethwaiteDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Aida ShiraziDepartment of Graduate Medical Education, Kaiser San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sandra TorrenteDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare cesarean delivery rates and indications by race/ethnicity among nulliparous women with term, singleton, vertex presentation deliveries.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women delivering term, singleton, vertex neonates at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 1/1/2016 to 6/30/2017. Women with cesarean for elective, malpresentation, or previa were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for maternal, neonatal, and facility factors were used to assess the likelihood of cesarean by race/ethnicity. Further modeling was performed to examine odds of cesarean for the indications of failure to progress and fetal intolerance by race/ethnicity.

resultsThe cohort of 16,587 racially/ethnically diverse women meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria consisted of 41.62% White, 27.73% Asian, 22.11% Hispanic, 5.32% Black, and 3.21% multiple race/other women. In adjusted logistic regression models, all race and ethnic categories had higher odds of cesarean deliveries in comparison to White women. Black women had the highest odds of cesarean delivery (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.45-2.06), followed by Asian (aOR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.45-2.06), multiple race/other (aOR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.17-1.80), and Hispanic (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.28-1.59) women. Compared with White women, Asian (aOR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.22-1.74) and Hispanic (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.03-1.52) women had higher odds of failure to progress as the indication. Among women with failure to progress, Black (aOR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30-0.81), Hispanic (aOR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.53-0.87), and Asian (aOR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.96) women were less likely than White women to reach 10 cm dilation. Compared with White women, Black women were more likely to have cesarean delivery for fetal intolerance (aOR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.10-2.07). Among women with fetal intolerance of labor, there were no significant differences by race/ethnicity for Apgar score or neonatal intensive care unit admission.

conclusionsRace/ethnicity was significantly associated with the odds of cesarean and indication. All other race/ethnicity groups had higher odds of cesarean compared with White women. Compared with White women, Black women had greater odds of fetal intolerance as an indication, while Hispanic and Asian women had greater odds of failure to progress. Maternal, neonate, and facility factors for cesarean delivery did not explain the observed disparities in cesarean delivery rates.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionEthnicityBlack PeopleFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesCesarean deliveryDisparitiesObstetric outcomes

Identifiers

PMID34254270
PMCPMC9249704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.