ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2021
Rhythmic and speech rate effects in the perception of durational cues.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Testing differential effects of periodicity and predictability in auditory rhythmic cueing of concurrent speech.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Listeners' perception of temporal contrasts in spoken language is highly sensitive to contextual information, such as variation in speech rate. The present study tests how rate-dependent perception is also mediated by distal (i.e., temporally removed) rhythmic patterns. In four experiments the role of rhythmic alternations and their interaction with speech rate effects are tested. Experiment 1 shows proximal speech rate (contrast) effects obtain based on changes in local context. Experiment 2 shows that these effects disappear with the addition of distal rhythmic alternations, indicating that rhythmic grouping shifts listeners' perception, even when proximal context conflicts. Experiments 3 and 4 explore how orthogonal variation in overall speech rate impacts these effects and finds that trial-to-trial (i.e., global) speech rate variation eliminates rhythmic grouping effects, both with and without variation in proximal (immediately preceding) context. Together, these results suggest a role for rhythmic patterning in listeners' processing of durational cues in speech, which interacts in various ways with proximal, distal, and global rate contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34254267What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.