ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021
Germline and tumor BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in Chinese triple-negative breast carcinomas.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- What is the appropriate genetic testing criteria for breast cancer in the Chinese population?-Analysis of genetic and clinical features from a single cancer center database.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Next-generation sequencing based detection ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Overview on population screening for carriers with germline BRCA mutation in China.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Molecular Classification, Treatment, and Genetic Biomarkers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBRCA1/2 screening for all triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients younger than 60 years may still be an economic burden in China. Further evidences that include incidence and outcome of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PV) screened based on younger age or family history (FH) are worth discussing for improving the cost-effectiveness of BRCA1/2 testing in Chinese TNBC. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of germline and tumor BRCA1/2 PV based on age screening in Chinese TNBC patients.
methodsPaired blood and tumor DNA from 124 unselected Chinese TNBC patients with less than or equal to 55 years were collected and analyzed for BRCA1/2 PV. Clinicopathological characteristics including age at diagnosis, FH and follow-up data were collected for further analysis.
resultsThe entire frequency of germline and tumor BRCA1/2 PV was 21.0 and 25%, respectively. Among them, 20 (16.1%) germline and 5 (4.0%) somatic BRCA1/2 single-nucleotide variant/insertion/deletions were found by NGS testing, 6 (4.8%) BRCA1 large genomic rearrangements were detected in blood DNA by MPLA. There was significant correlation between FH of HBOC and germline BRCA1/2 PVs among these patients. Patients with tumor BRCA1/2 PVs had significant improvements than non-carriers in PFS (p = 0.047). No significant impacts were found between various mutation status in OS outcomes. No significant differences were found between BRCA1 or BRCA2 and non-carriers in PFS or OS.
conclusionThere is a high incidence of germline and tumor BRCA1/2 PVs in Chinese TNBC patients with less than or equal to 55 years old. Tumor BRCA1/2 PV carriers showed an improved survival outcome. Our results suggest that BRCA1/2 PVs testing addressed within each specific clinical scenario could be more cost-effective for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.