Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34254200›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021

A Comprehensive Study of Data Augmentation Strategies for Prostate Cancer Detection in Diffusion-Weighted MRI Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Ruqian Hao, Khashayar Namdar, Lin Liu, Masoom A Haider, Farzad Khalvati

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruqian HaoSchool of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Khashayar NamdarDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lin LiuSchool of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Masoom A HaiderJoint Department of Medical Imaging, Sinai Health System, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Farzad KhalvatiInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. farzad.khalvati@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5616-8660
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data augmentation refers to a group of techniques whose goal is to battle limited amount of available data to improve model generalization and push sample distribution toward the true distribution. While different augmentation strategies and their combinations have been investigated for various computer vision tasks in the context of deep learning, a specific work in the domain of medical imaging is rare and to the best of our knowledge, there has been no dedicated work on exploring the effects of various augmentation methods on the performance of deep learning models in prostate cancer detection. In this work, we have statically applied five most frequently used augmentation techniques (random rotation, horizontal flip, vertical flip, random crop, and translation) to prostate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging training dataset of 217 patients separately and evaluated the effect of each method on the accuracy of prostate cancer detection. The augmentation algorithms were applied independently to each data channel and a shallow as well as a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained on the five augmented sets separately. We used area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) to evaluate the performance of the trained CNNs on a separate test set of 95 patients, using a validation set of 102 patients for finetuning. The shallow network outperformed the deep network with the best 2D slice-based AUC of 0.85 obtained by the rotation method.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerProstatic NeoplasmsAlgorithmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleCNNsData augmentationDiffusion-weighted MRIProstate cancer detection

Identifiers

PMID34254200
PMCPMC8455796
OpenAlexW3182080444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.