ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Efficacy of endoscopic management for anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of anastomotic leak testing in gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal perforations and leaks: Why, when, and how?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
- Current status of treatment for esophagojejunostomy leakage after total gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study in Korea.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2025Article
- Current Trends in Gastric Cancer Surgery and Postoperative Care.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Endoscopic purse-string suture technique for postoperative drain-related leakage management in gastrointestinal surgery.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.Visceral medicine · 2025Review
- Retrograde drainage for duodenal stump leakage using ileal decompression tube guided by double-balloon endoscopy: a novel case report.Surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Clinical value of prognostic nutritional index combined with C-reactive protein and albumin in early prediction of anastomotic leakage after radical gastric cancer surgery.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Endoscopic Intervention for Anastomotic Leakage After Gastrectomy.Journal of gastric cancer · 2024Review
- Current Trends in Volume and Surgical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Prognostic nutritional index combined with carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 242 for early prediction of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Risk factors and conservative therapy outcomes of anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy: Experience of 3,926 patients from a single gastric surgical unit.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic leakage (AL) after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients is associated with high mortality rates. Various endoscopic procedures are available to manage this postoperative complication. The aim of study was to evaluate the outcome of two endoscopic modalities, clippings and stents, for the treatment of AL. PATIENTS AND
methodsThere were 4916 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy between December 2007 and January 2016 at the National Cancer Center, Korea. A total of 115 patients (2.3%) developed AL. Of these, 85 patients (1.7%) received endoscopic therapy for AL and were included in this retrospective study. The endpoints were the complete leakage closure rates and risk factors associated with failure of endoscopic therapy.
resultsOf the 85 patients, 62 received endoscopic clippings (with or without detachable snares), and 23 received a stent insertion. Overall, the complete leakage closure rate was 80%, and no significant difference was found between the clipping and stent groups (79.0% vs. 82.6%, respectively; P = 0.89). The complete leakage closure rate was significantly lower in the duodenal and jejunal stump sites (60%) than esophageal sites (86.1%) and gastric sites (94.1%; P = 0.026). The multivariate analysis showed that stump leakage sites (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.51; P = 0.031) and the presence of intra-abdominal abscess (aOR, 4.92; P = -0.025) were associated with unsuccessful leakage closures.
conclusionsEndoscopic therapy using clippings or stents is an effective method for the postoperative management of AL in gastric cancer patients. This therapy can be considered a primary treatment option due to its demonstrated efficacy, safety, and minimally invasive nature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.