Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34254173›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2022

Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary respiratory support strategies for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jie Li, Long Chen, Yuan Shi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jie LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China.
Long Chen *Department of Neonatology, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical DisordersChongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 400014, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yuan Shi *Department of Neonatology, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical DisordersChongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 400014, Chongqing, People's Republic of China. petshi530@vip.163.com.
Chongqing Medical University · CNChina International Science and Technology Cooperation · CN

Funding

Doctoral Program Foundation of Institutions of Higher Education of China K022Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) is a new respiratory support strategy despite lacking of enough evidence in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The aim of the present systematic review was to explore whether NHFOV reduced the intubation rate as compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) as the primary respiratory support strategies in preterm infants with RDS. Medline, the Cochrane library, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang data Information Site were searched from inception to Jan 1, 2021(Prospero2019 CRD42019129316, date and name of registration: Apr 23,2019, The clinical effectiveness of NHFOV vs NCPAP for preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome). Pooled data from clinically randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NHFOV with NCPAP as the primary respiratory supporting strategies in preterm infants with RDS were performed using the fixed-effects models whenever no heterogeneity was shown. The primary outcome was intubation rate. Four randomized controlled trials involving 570 participants were included. Comparing with NCPAP, NHFOV resulted in less intubation (relative risk (RR) 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.67, P = 0.0002), and heterogeneity was not found among the trials in the fixed-effects model (P = 0.78, I

Indexed as

High-Frequency VentilationRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornContinuous Positive Airway PressureHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntermittent Positive-Pressure VentilationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicNasal continuous positive airway pressureNasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilationPretermRespiratory distress syndrome

Identifiers

PMID34254173
OpenAlexW3137644582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.