ArticleScientific reports2021
Comparative analysis of oral-gut microbiota between captive and wild long-tailed macaque in Thailand.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparative analysis of gut microbiota and host phenotypic characteristics across enterotype-like clusters in cynomolgus and rhesus macaques.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Bidirectional regulation of the brain-gut axis inMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Adaptive changes in the intestinal microbiota of giant pandas following reintroduction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anatomical site and environmental exposure differentially shape the microbiota across mucosal tissues in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reintroduction training is instrumental in restoring the oral microbiota of giant pandas from "captivity" to "wildness".BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota Between Wild and Captive Guizhou Snub-Nosed Monkey (Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Full-length 16S rDNA sequencing based on Oxford Nanopore Technologies revealed the association between gut-pharyngeal microbiota and tuberculosis in cynomolgus macaques.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Geographic and environmental impacts on gut microbiome in Himalayan langurs (Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Variation on gut microbiota diversity of endangered red pandas (Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Analysis on Changes and Influencing Factors of the Intestinal Microbiota of Alpine Musk Deer between the Place of Origin and Migration.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- The long-term gut bacterial signature of a wild primate is associated with a timing effect of pre- and postnatal maternal glucocorticoid levels.Microbiome · 2023Article
- Alteration of gut microbiota in wild-borne long-tailed macaques after 1-year being housed in hygienic captivity.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Captivity restructures the gut microbiota of François' langurs (Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Limited microbiome differences in captive and semi-wild primate populations consuming similar diets.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2022Article
- On the Pathogenicity of the Oral Biofilm: A Critical Review from a Biological, Evolutionary, and Nutritional Point of View.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Bacterial microbiota in upper respiratory tract of COVID-19 and influenza patients.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022Observational
- Characterization of captive and wild 13-lined ground squirrel cecal microbiotas using Illumina-based sequencing.Animal microbiome · 2022Article
- Oral and fecal microbiome of confiscated Bengal slow lorises in response to confinement duration.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis), distributed in Southeast Asia, are generally used in biomedical research. At present, the expansion of human communities overlapping of macaques' natural habitat causes human-macaque conflicts. To mitigate this problem in Thailand, the National Primate Research Center of Thailand, Chulalongkorn University (NPRCT-CU), was granted the permit to catch the surplus wild-born macaques and transfer them to the center. Based on the fact that the diets provided and the captive environments were different, their oral-gut microbiota should be altered. Thus, we investigated and compared the oral and fecal microbiome between wild-born macaques that lived in the natural habitats and those transferred to and reared in the NPRCT-CU for 1 year. The results from 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing showed that the captive macaques had distinct oral-gut microbiota profiles and lower bacterial richness compared to those in wild macaques. The gut of wild macaques was dominated by Firmicutes which is probably associated with lipid absorption and storage. These results implicated the effects of captivity conditions on the microbiome that might contribute to crucial metabolic functions. Our study should be applied to the animal health care program, with respect to microbial functions, for non-human primates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.