Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34253776›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

In-vitro, in-vivo, and in-silico assessment of radical scavenging and cytotoxic activities of Oliveria decumbens essential oil and its main components.

Tahereh Jamali, Gholamreza Kavoosi, Yousef Jamali, Saeed Mortezazadeh, Susan K Ardestani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optimization ofRSC advances · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The potential ofJournal of integrative bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Essential Oil fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. A bis(pyrazolyl)methane derivative against clinicalLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022
    Article
  13. Hesperidin Inhibits Lung CancerFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tahereh JamaliInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Gholamreza KavoosiInstitute of Biotechnology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Yousef JamaliBiomathematics Laboratory, Department of Applied Mathematics, School of Mathematical Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Saeed MortezazadehDepartment of Biophysics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Susan K ArdestaniInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. Ardestany@ut.ac.ir.
Tarbiat Modares University · IRUniversity of Tehran · IRShiraz University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to explore and compare new insights on the pharmacological potential of Oliveria decumbence essential oil (OEO) and its main components highlighting their antioxidant activity in-vitro, in-vivo, and in-silico and also cytotoxic effects of OEO against A549 lung cancer cells. At first, based on GC-MS analysis, thymol, carvacrol, p-cymene, and γ-terpinene were introduced as basic ingredients of OEO and their in-vitro antioxidant capacity was considered by standard methods. Collectively, OEO exhibited strong antioxidant properties even more than its components. In LPS-stimulated macrophages treated with OEO, the reduction of ROS (Reactive-oxygen-species) and NO (nitric-oxide) and down-regulation of iNOS (inducible nitric-oxide-synthase) and NOX (NADPH-oxidase) mRNA expression was observed and compared with that of OEO components. According to the results, OEO, thymol, and carvacrol exhibited the highest radical scavenging potency compared to p-cymene, and γ-terpinene. In-silico Molecular-Docking and Molecular-Dynamics simulation indicated that thymol and carvacrol but no p-cymene and γ-terpinene may establish coordinative bonds in iNOS active site and thereby inhibit iNOS. However, they did not show any evidence for NOX inhibition. In the following, MTT assay showed that OEO induces cytotoxicity in A549 cancer cells despite having a limited effect on L929 normal cells. Apoptotic death and its dependence on caspase-3 activity and Bax/Bcl2 ratio in OEO-treated cells were established by fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry, colorimetric assay, and western blot analysis. Additionally, flow cytometry studies demonstrated increased levels of ROS in OEO-treated cells. Therefore, OEO, despite showing antioxidant properties, induces apoptosis in cancer cells by increasing ROS levels. Collectively, our results provided new insight into the usage of OEO and main components, thymol, and carvacrol, into the development of novel antioxidant and anti-cancer agents.

Indexed as

Free Radical ScavengersA549 CellsAnimalsAntioxidantsApiaceaeApoptosisCaspase 3Cell LineComputer SimulationCyclohexane MonoterpenesCymenesDown-RegulationHumansInhibitory Concentration 50In Vitro TechniquesLigands4-cymeneAntioxidantsCaspase 3Cyclohexane MonoterpenesCymenesFree Radical Scavengersgamma-terpineneLigandsMonoterpenesNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIOils, VolatileRNA, MessengerThymol

Identifiers

PMID34253776
PMCPMC8275595
OpenAlexW3181656568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.