ArticleBMJ quality & safety2022
Co-produced capability framework for successful patient and staff partnerships in healthcare quality improvement: results of a scoping review.
Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Better Healthcare Together: Co-Designing a Framework for Health Service Co-Design.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Using the Collective Impact Model to Organize Evidence-Based Programs to Educate Health Care Professionals About the Care Needs of Individuals with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Patient-centred care: is it enough?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2026Article
- Engaging patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) in patient safety in healthcare organisations: a rapid scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- 'Making little ethical decisions all the time': examining an ethical framework for consumer and community involvement in research, a co-produced ethnographic study.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Developing an evaluation tool for the impact of consumer partnerships in healthcare governance: a coproduced mixed methods study.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- A Qualitative Study to Improve How We Partner With Patients and Families in Healthcare Improvement Collaboratives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Identifying potential outcomes of patient engagement in primary care quality improvement: a modified Delphi study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Development of a capability framework for Allied Health research careers in health services.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Exploring a Co-Designed Approach for Healthcare Quality Improvement-Learning Through Developmental Evaluation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Supporting the continuous development and use of a patient partnership framework in European rare disease networks (ERNs): a scoping review of frameworks in the scientific literature.Journal of community genetics · 2025Review
- A Practical Approach for Developing Shared Decision-Making Knowledge, Skills, and Capability for Busy Health Care Practitioners.The Permanente journal · 2024Article
- The Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Managers on Patient Involvement in Care Pathway Development: A Discourse Analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- 'Safety is about partnership': Safety through the lens of patients and caregivers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Task Shifting and Task Sharing Implementation in Africa: A Scoping Review on Rationale and Scope.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- 'Learning and growing together': exploring consumer partnerships in a PhD, an ethnographic study.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Different in so many ways: Exploring consumer, health service staff, and academic partnerships in a research advisory group through rapid ethnography.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2022Article
- The experience of patient partners in research: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.Research involvement and engagement · 2022Review
- Refining a capability development framework for building successful consumer and staff partnerships in healthcare quality improvement: A coproduced eDelphi study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInternationally, patient and public involvement (PPI) is core policy for health service quality improvement (QI). However, authentic QI partnerships are not commonplace. A lack of patient and staff capability to deliver successful partnerships may be a barrier to meaningful QI collaboration.
objectivesThe research questions for this scoping review were: What is known regarding the capabilities required for healthcare staff and patients to effectively partner in QI at the service level?; and What is known regarding the best practice learning and development strategies required to build and support those capabilities?
methodsA six-stage scoping review was completed. Five electronic databases were searched for publications from January 2010 to February 2020. The database searches incorporated relevant terms for the following concepts: capabilities for PPI in healthcare QI; and best practice learning and development strategies to support those capabilities. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis.
resultsForty-nine papers were included. Very little peer-reviewed literature focused explicitly on capabilities for QI partnerships and thus implicit paper content was analysed. A
conclusionThe framework developed here could guide individualised development or learning plans for patient partners and staff, or could assist organisations to review learning topics and approaches such as training content, mentoring guidelines or community of practice agendas. Future directions include refining and evaluating the framework. Development approaches such as self-reflection, communities of practice, and remote learning need to be expanded and evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.