Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34253668›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Effects of integrated economic and health interventions with women's groups on health-related knowledge, behaviours and outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.

Sapna Desai, Kala M Mehta, Roopal Jyoti Singh, Allie K Westley, Osasuyi Dirisu, Connie Wong, Thomas De Hoop, Gary L Darmstadt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sapna DesaiPopulation Council India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2596-9726
Kala M MehtaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Roopal Jyoti SinghPopulation Council India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Allie K WestleyStanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Osasuyi DirisuPopulation Council Nigeria, Utako, Nigeria.
Connie WongLane Medical Library, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Thomas De HoopInternational Development Division, American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Gary L DarmstadtDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA gdarmsta@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7522-5824
Stanford University · USPopulation Council Institute · INAmerican Institutes for Research · USMedical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria · NGUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEconomic groups, such as microfinance or self-help groups are widely implemented in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Women's groups are voluntary groups, which aim to improve the well-being of members through activities, such as joint savings, credit, livelihoods development and/or health activities. Health interventions are increasingly added on to existing women's economic groups as a public health intervention for women and their families. Here, we present the protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review we will conduct of the evidence on integrated economic and health interventions on women's groups to assess whether and how they improve health-related knowledge, behaviour and outcomes in LMICs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search seven electronic databases for published literature, along with manual searches and consultation. The review will include (1) randomised trials and non-randomised quasiexperimental studies of intervention effects of integrated economic and health interventions delivered through women's groups in LMICs, and (2) sibling studies that examine factors related to intervention content, context, implementation processes and costs. We will appraise risk of bias and study quality using standard tools. High and moderate quality studies will be grouped by health domain and synthesised without meta-analysis. Qualitative evidence will be thematically synthesised and integrated into the quantitative synthesis using a matrix approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was reviewed and deemed exempt by the institutional review board at the American Institutes for Research. Findings will be shared through peer-reviewed publication and disseminated with programme implementers and policymakers engaged with women's groups. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020199998.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesWomenFemaleHumansIncomePovertyQualitative ResearchSystematic Reviews as Topichealth economicsinternational health servicespublic health

Identifiers

PMID34253668
PMCPMC8276287
OpenAlexW3178755357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.