Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34253650›Full record

SynthesisLupus science & medicine2021

A multianalyte assay panel with cell-bound complement activation products demonstrates clinical utility in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Roberta Vezza Alexander, Daniel Scott Rey, John Conklin, Vinicius Domingues, Mansoor Ahmed, Jazibeh Qureshi, Arthur Weinstein

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lupus science & medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The complement system in autoimmune diseases: pathogenesis, diagnostic markers, and therapeutic strategies.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Roberta Vezza AlexanderExagen Inc, Vista, California, USA ralexander@exagen.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8827-8637
Daniel Scott ReyExagen Inc, Vista, California, USA.
John ConklinExagen Inc, Vista, California, USA.
Vinicius DominguesFlorida State University Regional Medical School, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA.
Mansoor AhmedArthritis & Osteoporosis Center of Kentucky, Richmond, Kentucky, USA.
Jazibeh QureshiRheumatology Express, Catonsville, Maryland, USA.
Arthur WeinsteinExagen Inc, Vista, California, USA.
Altoona Arthritis and Osteoporosis Center · USFlorida State University · USLoma Linda University · USRheumatology Consultants · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the clinical utility of the multianalyte assay panel (MAP), commercially known as AVISE Lupus test (Exagen Inc.), in patients suspected of SLE.

methodsA systematic review of medical records of ANA-positive patients with a positive (>0.1) or negative (<-0.1) MAP score was conducted when the MAP was ordered (T0), when the test results were reviewed (T1) and at a later time (T2, ≥8 months after T1). Confidence in the diagnosis of SLE and initiation of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were assessed.

resultsA total of 161 patient records from 12 centres were reviewed at T0 and T1. T2 occurred for 90 patients. At T0, low, moderate and high confidence in SLE diagnosis was reported for 58%, 30% and 12% patients, respectively. Confidence in SLE diagnosis increased for the MAP positive, while MAP negative made SLE less likely. Odds of higher confidence in SLE diagnosis increased by 1.74-fold for every unit of increase of the MAP score (p<0.001). Using the MAP-negative/anti-double-stranded DNA-negative patients as reference, the HR of assigning an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision lupus code was 7.02-fold, 11.2-fold and 14.8-fold higher in the low tier-2, high tier-2 and tier-1 positive, respectively (p<0.001). The HR of initiating HCQ therapy after T0 was 2.90-fold, 4.22-fold and 3.98-fold higher, respectively (p<0.001).

conclusionThe MAP helps increase the confidence in ruling-in and ruling-out SLE in patients suspected of the disease and informs on appropriate treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicComplement ActivationComplement System ProteinsHumansHydroxychloroquineComplement System ProteinsHydroxychloroquineantirheumatic agentsbiological productslupus erythematosussystemic

Identifiers

PMID34253650
PMCPMC8276296
OpenAlexW3181825500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.