Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34253637›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Dichotomous impact of affinity on the function of T cell engaging bispecific antibodies.

Mathilde Poussin, Arlene Sereno, Xiufeng Wu, Flora Huang, Jason Manro, Shanshan Cao, Carmine Carpenito, Andrew Glasebrook, Daniel J Powell, Stephen Demarest

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Bispecific Antibodies in Hematologic Malignancies: Attacking the Frontline.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mathilde Poussin *Pathology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4603-3508
Arlene Sereno *Eli Lilly and Company Biotechnology Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Xiufeng WuEli Lilly and Company Biotechnology Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Flora HuangEli Lilly and Company Biotechnology Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Jason ManroEli Lilly and Company Biotechnology Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Shanshan CaoEli Lilly and Company Biotechnology Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Carmine CarpenitoEli Lilly and Company Biotechnology Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Andrew GlasebrookEli Lilly and Company Biotechnology Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Daniel J PowellPathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA poda@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Stephen DemarestEli Lilly and Company Biotechnology Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBispecific T cell engagers represent the majority of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) entering the clinic to treat metastatic cancer. The ability to apply these agents safely and efficaciously in the clinic, particularly for solid tumors, has been challenging. Many preclinical studies have evaluated parameters related to the activity of T cell engaging BsAbs, but many questions remain. MAIN BODY: This study investigates the impact of affinity of T cell engaging BsAbs with regards to potency, efficacy, and induction of immunomodulatory receptors/ligands using HER-2/CD3 BsAbs as a model system. We show that an IgG BsAb can be as efficacious as a smaller BsAb format both in vitro and in vivo. We uncover a dichotomous relationship between tumor-associated antigen (TAA) affinity and CD3 affinity requirements for cells that express high versus low levels of TAA. HER-2 affinity directly correlated with the CD3 engager lysis potency of HER-2/CD3 BsAbs when HER-2 receptor numbers are high (~200 K/cell), while the CD3 affinity did not impact potency until its binding affinity was extremely low (<600 nM). When HER-2 receptor numbers were lower (~20 K/cell), both HER-2 and CD3 affinity impacted potency. The high affinity anti-HER-2/low CD3 affinity BsAb also demonstrated lower cytokine induction levels in vivo and a dosing paradigm atypical of extremely high potency T cell engaging BsAbs reaching peak efficacy at doses >3 mg/kg. This data confirms that low CD3 affinity provides an opportunity for improved safety and dosing for T cell engaging BsAbs. T cell redirection also led to upregulation of Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and 4-1BB, but not CTLA-4 on T cells, and to Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) upregulation on HER-2

conclusionsOverall, these studies provide an informational dive into the optimization process of CD3 engaging BsAbs for solid tumors indicating that a reduced affinity for CD3 may enable a better therapeutic index with a greater selectivity for the target tumor and a reduced cytokine release syndrome. These studies also provide an additional argument for combining T cell checkpoint inhibition and co-stimulation to achieve optimal efficacy.

background

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BispecificHumansMiceT-LymphocytesAntibodies, Bispecificantibody affinityimmunotherapyt-lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID34253637
PMCPMC8276301
OpenAlexW3177547893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.