Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34253604›Full record

SynthesisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Adoption of community monitoring improves common pool resource management across contexts.

Tara Slough, Daniel Rubenson, Ro'ee Levy, Francisco Alpizar Rodriguez, María Bernedo Del Carpio, Mark T Buntaine, Darin Christensen, Alicia Cooperman, Sabrina Eisenbarth, Paul J Ferraro and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strengthening community-based fisheries monitoring programs with Indigenous perspectives.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Citizen monitoring of waterways decreases pollution in China by supporting government action and oversight.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. On design-based empirical research and its interpretation and ethics in sustainability science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. A call for structured ethics appendices in social science papers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Synthesizing evidence in sustainability science through harmonized experiments: Community monitoring in common pool resources.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Citizen monitoring promotes informed and inclusive forest governance in Liberia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 16 institutions in 6 countries.

Tara SloughDepartment of Politics, New York University, New York, NY 10012; tara.slough@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2752-7526
Daniel RubensonDepartment of Politics, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6887-2735
Ro'ee LevyDepartment of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0001-7351-8554
Francisco Alpizar RodriguezDepartment of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, 6700EW Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8479-081X
María Bernedo Del CarpioDepartment of Economics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250.ORCID 0000-0002-1563-057X
Mark T BuntaineBren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.ORCID 0000-0002-7139-2078
Darin ChristensenLuskin School of Public Affairs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0003-0606-2934
Alicia CoopermanDepartment of Political Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.ORCID 0000-0002-1652-4488
Sabrina EisenbarthUniversity of Exeter Business School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PU, United Kingdom.
Paul J FerraroCarey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21202.ORCID 0000-0002-4777-5108
Louis GrahamBusara Center For Behavioral Economics, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-9538-0867
Alexandra C HartmanDepartment of Political Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6847-3734
Jacob KopasPrivate address, New York, NY 10025.
Sasha McLartyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
Anouk S RigterinkSchool of Government and International Affairs, Durham University, Durham DH1 3TU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9216-7371
Cyrus SamiiDepartment of Politics, New York University, New York, NY 10012.ORCID 0000-0002-0823-1319
Brigitte SeimDepartment of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.ORCID 0000-0001-7963-4767
Johannes UrpelainenSchool of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC 20036.
Bing ZhangState Key Laboratory of Pollution Control & Resource Reuse, School of Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3395-8667
Johns Hopkins University · USNew York University · USBusara Center for Behavioral Economics · KEDurham University · GBMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USState Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse · CNTexas A&M University · USToronto Metropolitan University · CAUniversity College London · GBUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · USUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWageningen University & Research · NLWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pervasive overuse and degradation of common pool resources (CPRs) is a global concern. To sustainably manage CPRs, effective governance institutions are essential. A large literature has developed to describe the institutional design features employed by communities that successfully manage their CPRs. Yet, these designs remain far from universally adopted. We focus on one prominent institutional design feature, community monitoring, and ask whether nongovernmental organizations or governments can facilitate its adoption and whether adoption of monitoring affects CPR use. To answer these questions, we implemented randomized controlled trials in six countries. The harmonized trials randomly assigned the introduction of community monitoring to 400 communities, with data collection in an additional 347 control communities. Most of the 400 communities adopted regular monitoring practices over the course of a year. In a meta-analysis of the experimental results from the six sites, we find that the community monitoring reduced CPR use and increased user satisfaction and knowledge by modest amounts. Our findings demonstrate that community monitoring can improve CPR management in disparate contexts, even when monitoring is externally initiated rather than homegrown. These findings provide guidance for the design of future programs and policies intended to develop monitoring capabilities in communities. Furthermore, our harmonized, multisite trial provides sustainability science with a new way to study the complexity of socioecological systems and builds generalizable insights about how to improve CPR management.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental PolicyHumansResearch Designcommon pool resourcescommunity monitoringinstitutional adoptionmeta-analysismultisite trial

Identifiers

PMID34253604
PMCPMC8307849
OpenAlexW3180763286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.