Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34253260›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical case reports2021

Massive uterine fibroid: a diagnostic dilemma: a case report and review of the literature.

Wiesener Viva, Dhanawat Juhi, Andresen Kristin, Mathiak Micaela, Both Marcus, Alkatout Ibrahim, Bauerschlag Dirk

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Giant "Hydra Headed" Uterine Fibroid in a Nullipara: A Case Report.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Myomatous erythrocytosis syndrome: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Wiesener VivaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center UKSH, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus C, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Dhanawat JuhiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center UKSH, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus C, 24105, Kiel, Germany. juhidhanawat@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-1376
Andresen KristinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center UKSH, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus C, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Mathiak MicaelaInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center UKSH, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus C, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Both MarcusDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center UKSH, Campus Kiel, Arnold Heller Straße 3, Haus C, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Alkatout IbrahimDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center UKSH, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus C, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Bauerschlag DirkDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center UKSH, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus C, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFibroids of the uterus are the most common benign pelvic tumors in women worldwide. Their diagnosis is usually not missed because of the widespread and well-established use of ultrasound in gynecological clinics. Hence, the development of an unusually large myoma is a rare event, particularly in first-world countries such as Germany. It is even more uncommon that a myoma is misdiagnosed as a dietary failure. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein, we report the case of a Caucasian woman with a giant fibroid that reached a size of over 50 cm, growing slowly over the past 15 years, and was misdiagnosed as abdominal fat due to weight gain. We aim to discuss the factors that lead to the growth of such a huge tumoral mass, including misdiagnosis and treatment, and the psychological impact. Through this case, we intend to increase the awareness among general physicians and gynecologists. Although menstrual disorders incorporate several pathologies, adequate assessment remains the primary responsibility of health care providers. A literature review revealed approximately 60 cases of giant uterine fibroids.

conclusionThe use of clinical and diagnostic devices, especially ultrasound, in this case, is indispensable. In conclusion, the growth of a giant fibroid can have disastrous effects on a woman's health, including surgical trauma and psychological issues.

Indexed as

LeiomyomaUterine NeoplasmsFemaleGermanyHumansUltrasonographyGiant fibroidMisdiagnosisSurgeryUterine massWeight gain

Identifiers

PMID34253260
PMCPMC8276390
OpenAlexW3178917139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.