ArticlemBio2021
Identification of Group A Streptococcus Genes Directly Regulated by CsrRS and Novel Intermediate Regulators.
Article in mBio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of cathelicidin cleavage by SpeB onbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A protease-sensing circuit links neutrophil inflammation to virulence regulation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A nested PCR-based point-of-care multiplex test for detection of bacterial pathogens in cerebrospinal fluids.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- The virulence regulator CovR boosts CRISPR-Cas9 immunity in Group B Streptococcus.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Characterization of a novelmBio · 2025Article
- The intricate pathogenicity of Group AVirulence · 2024Review
- Group A Streptococcus interactions with the host across time and space.Current opinion in microbiology · 2024Review
- Identifying genetic determinants of Streptococcus pyogenes-host interactions in a murine intact skin infection model.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Identification of distinct impacts of CovS inactivation on the transcriptome of acapsular group A streptococci.mSystems · 2023Article
- Elucidation of independently modulated genes inmSystems · 2023Article
- Hyperphosphorylation of the Group A Streptococcal Control of Virulence Regulator Increases Promoter Occupancy Specifically at Virulence Factor-Encoding Genes.Journal of bacteriology · 2023Article
- RopB represses the transcription ofLife science alliance · 2023Article
- A Novel CovS Variant Harbored by a Colonization Strain Reduces Streptococcus pyogenes Virulence.Journal of bacteriology · 2023Article
- Article
- CovS inactivation reduces CovR promoter binding at diverse virulence factor encoding genes in group A Streptococcus.PLoS pathogens · 2022Article
- The CovR regulatory network drives the evolution of Group B Streptococcus virulence.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptation of group A Streptococcus (GAS) to its human host is mediated by two-component systems that transduce external stimuli to regulate bacterial physiology. Among such systems, CsrRS (also known as CovRS) is the most extensively characterized for its role in regulating ∼10% of the GAS genome, including several virulence genes. Here, we show that extracellular magnesium and the human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 have opposing effects on the phosphorylation of the response regulator CsrR by the receptor kinase CsrS. Genetic inactivation of CsrS phosphatase or kinase activity, respectively, had similar but more pronounced effects on CsrR phosphorylation compared to growth in magnesium or LL-37. These changes in CsrR phosphorylation were correlated with the repression or activation of CsrR-regulated genes as assessed by NanoString analysis. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) revealed CsrR occupancy at CsrRS-regulated promoters and lower-affinity associations at many other locations on the GAS chromosome. Because ChIP-seq did not detect CsrR occupancy at promoters associated with some CsrR-regulated genes, we investigated whether these genes might be controlled indirectly by intermediate regulators whose expression is modulated by CsrR. Transcriptional profiling of mutant strains deficient in the expression of either of two previously uncharacterized transcription regulators in the CsrR regulon indicated that one or both proteins participated in the regulation of 22 of the 42 CsrR-regulated promoters for which no CsrR association was detected by ChIP-seq. Taken together, these results illuminate CsrRS-mediated regulation of GAS gene expression through modulation of CsrR phosphorylation, CsrR association with regulated promoters, and the control of intermediate transcription regulators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.