Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34252974›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

Thermodynamic modeling reveals widespread multivalent binding by RNA-binding proteins.

Salma Sohrabi-Jahromi, Johannes Söding

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Salma Sohrabi-JahromiQuantitative and Computational Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen 37077, Germany.
Johannes SödingQuantitative and Computational Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen 37077, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationUnderstanding how proteins recognize their RNA targets is essential to elucidate regulatory processes in the cell. Many RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) form complexes or have multiple domains that allow them to bind to RNA in a multivalent, cooperative manner. They can thereby achieve higher specificity and affinity than proteins with a single RNA-binding domain. However, current approaches to de novo discovery of RNA binding motifs do not take multivalent binding into account.

resultsWe present Bipartite Motif Finder (BMF), which is based on a thermodynamic model of RBPs with two cooperatively binding RNA-binding domains. We show that bivalent binding is a common strategy among RBPs, yielding higher affinity and sequence specificity. We furthermore illustrate that the spatial geometry between the binding sites can be learned from bound RNA sequences. These discovered bipartite motifs are consistent with previously known motifs and binding behaviors. Our results demonstrate the importance of multivalent binding for RNA-binding proteins and highlight the value of bipartite motif models in representing the multivalency of protein-RNA interactions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: BMF source code is available at https://github.com/soedinglab/bipartite_motif_finder under a GPL license. The BMF web server is accessible at https://bmf.soedinglab.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

RNA-Binding ProteinsSoftwareBinding SitesProtein BindingRNAThermodynamicsRNARNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34252974
PMCPMC8275352
OpenAlexW3180762521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.