ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Statistical approaches for differential expression analysis in metatranscriptomics.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic plasticity of the gut microbiome in response to diets differing in glycemic load in a randomized, crossover, controlled feeding study.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Trial
- Antisense transcription reveals disease-associated adaptations in the human gut microbiome.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Integrative analysis of rumen microbiota activity and host metabolism following methanogenesis inhibition in dairy cattle.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Microbial single-cell transcriptomics links gut microbiota functional states to metabolic changes in male mice.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Predicting functions of uncharacterized gene products from microbial communities.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- An Exponential Scale Mixture Model for Metatranscriptomics Data with Application to Inflammatory Bowel Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Navigating multi-omic integration methods for human microbiome research.Nature microbiology · 2026Review
- Enhancing inference of differential gene expression in metatranscriptomes from human microbial communities.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Water kefir as a paradigm for multi-omics and genome-scale metabolic modelling in fermented food.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Review
- MaAsLin 3: refining and extending generalized multivariable linear models for meta-omic association discovery.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Dysregulated expression of cell cycle regulators CDC20, PLK1, BUB1, CDC45, CDCA5 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Design, processing, and modeling for longitudinal multiomics microbiome data.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- A genomic view of Earth's biomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Chronic hepatitis D infection is associated with distinguishing microbial and functional features in the gut microbiome.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Glycoside hydrolase-mediated glucomannan catabolism inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Seasonal enhancement of the viral shunt catalyzes a subsurface oxygen maximum in the Sargasso Sea.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Environmental RNA-Based Metatranscriptomics as a Novel Biomonitoring Tool: A Case Study of Glyphosate-Based Herbicide Effects on Freshwater Eukaryotic Communities.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Systematic evaluation of metatranscriptomic differential gene expressionbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Dissecting microbial communities with single-cell transcriptome analysis.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMetatranscriptomics (MTX) has become an increasingly practical way to profile the functional activity of microbial communities in situ. However, MTX remains underutilized due to experimental and computational limitations. The latter are complicated by non-independent changes in both RNA transcript levels and their underlying genomic DNA copies (as microbes simultaneously change their overall abundance in the population and regulate individual transcripts), genetic plasticity (as whole loci are frequently gained and lost in microbial lineages) and measurement compositionality and zero-inflation. Here, we present a systematic evaluation of and recommendations for differential expression (DE) analysis in MTX.
resultsWe designed and assessed six statistical models for DE discovery in MTX that incorporate different combinations of DNA and RNA normalization and assumptions about the underlying changes of gene copies or species abundance within communities. We evaluated these models on multiple simulated and real multi-omic datasets. Models adjusting transcripts relative to their encoding gene copies as a covariate were significantly more accurate in identifying DE from MTX in both simulated and real datasets. Moreover, we show that when paired DNA measurements (metagenomic data) are not available, models normalizing MTX measurements within-species while also adjusting for total-species RNA balance sensitivity, specificity and interpretability of DE detection, as does filtering likely technical zeros. The efficiency and accuracy of these models pave the way for more effective MTX-based DE discovery in microbial communities. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The analysis code and synthetic datasets used in this evaluation are available online at http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/mtx2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.