Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34252963›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

Statistical approaches for differential expression analysis in metatranscriptomics.

Yancong Zhang, Kelsey N Thompson, Curtis Huttenhower, Eric A Franzosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Design, processing, and modeling for longitudinal multiomics microbiome data.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  14. A genomic view of Earth's biomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Glycoside hydrolase-mediated glucomannan catabolism inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Systematic evaluation of metatranscriptomic differential gene expressionbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yancong ZhangHarvard Chan Microbiome in Public Health Center, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Kelsey N ThompsonHarvard Chan Microbiome in Public Health Center, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Curtis HuttenhowerHarvard Chan Microbiome in Public Health Center, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Eric A FranzosaHarvard Chan Microbiome in Public Health Center, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Funding

Pilot & Feasibility ProgramP30DK043351 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RAYMOND T CHUNG · 1991 to 2026
$35.3M
A comprehensive platform for novel therapy development from the microbiomeR24DK110499 · NIDDK · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI HUTTENHOWER, CURTIS · 2017 to 2021
$7.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK043351NIDDK NIH HHS R24 DK110499NIH HHSTakeda Pharmaceuticals
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMetatranscriptomics (MTX) has become an increasingly practical way to profile the functional activity of microbial communities in situ. However, MTX remains underutilized due to experimental and computational limitations. The latter are complicated by non-independent changes in both RNA transcript levels and their underlying genomic DNA copies (as microbes simultaneously change their overall abundance in the population and regulate individual transcripts), genetic plasticity (as whole loci are frequently gained and lost in microbial lineages) and measurement compositionality and zero-inflation. Here, we present a systematic evaluation of and recommendations for differential expression (DE) analysis in MTX.

resultsWe designed and assessed six statistical models for DE discovery in MTX that incorporate different combinations of DNA and RNA normalization and assumptions about the underlying changes of gene copies or species abundance within communities. We evaluated these models on multiple simulated and real multi-omic datasets. Models adjusting transcripts relative to their encoding gene copies as a covariate were significantly more accurate in identifying DE from MTX in both simulated and real datasets. Moreover, we show that when paired DNA measurements (metagenomic data) are not available, models normalizing MTX measurements within-species while also adjusting for total-species RNA balance sensitivity, specificity and interpretability of DE detection, as does filtering likely technical zeros. The efficiency and accuracy of these models pave the way for more effective MTX-based DE discovery in microbial communities. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The analysis code and synthetic datasets used in this evaluation are available online at http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/mtx2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

MetagenomeMetagenomicsModels, StatisticalRNASequence Analysis, RNASoftwareRNA

Identifiers

PMID34252963
PMCPMC8275336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.