Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34252961›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

doubletD: detecting doublets in single-cell DNA sequencing data.

Leah L Weber, Palash Sashittal, Mohammed El-Kebir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolution and Co-occurrence of PI3K Pathway Gene Mutations in Endometrial Carcinoma Molecular Subtypes at the Single-Cell Level.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Multi-omics in exploring the pathophysiology of diabetic retinopathy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leah L WeberDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbama, IL 61801, USA.
Palash SashittalDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbama, IL 61801, USA.
Mohammed El-KebirDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbama, IL 61801, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation CCF 1850502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationWhile single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) has enabled the study of intratumor heterogeneity at an unprecedented resolution, current technologies are error-prone and often result in doublets where two or more cells are mistaken for a single cell. Not only do doublets confound downstream analyses, but the increase in doublet rate is also a major bottleneck preventing higher throughput with current single-cell technologies. Although doublet detection and removal are standard practice in scRNA-seq data analysis, options for scDNA-seq data are limited. Current methods attempt to detect doublets while also performing complex downstream analyses tasks, leading to decreased efficiency and/or performance.

resultsWe present doubletD, the first standalone method for detecting doublets in scDNA-seq data. Underlying our method is a simple maximum likelihood approach with a closed-form solution. We demonstrate the performance of doubletD on simulated data as well as real datasets, outperforming current methods for downstream analysis of scDNA-seq data that jointly infer doublets as well as standalone approaches for doublet detection in scRNA-seq data. Incorporating doubletD in scDNA-seq analysis pipelines will reduce complexity and lead to more accurate results. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/elkebir-group/doubletD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisSoftwareGene Expression ProfilingLikelihood FunctionsSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID34252961
PMCPMC8275324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.