Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34252957›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

Disease gene prediction with privileged information and heteroscedastic dropout.

Juan Shu, Yu Li, Sheng Wang, Bowei Xi, Jianzhu Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review of the Application of Graph Neural Networks to Extract Candidate Genes and Biological Associations.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan ShuDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.
Yu LiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of HongKong, HongKong 999077, China.
Sheng WangPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Bowei XiDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.
Jianzhu MaInstitute for Artificial Intelligence, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationRecently, machine learning models have achieved tremendous success in prioritizing candidate genes for genetic diseases. These models are able to accurately quantify the similarity among disease and genes based on the intuition that similar genes are more likely to be associated with similar diseases. However, the genetic features these methods rely on are often hard to collect due to high experimental cost and various other technical limitations. Existing solutions of this problem significantly increase the risk of overfitting and decrease the generalizability of the models.

resultsIn this work, we propose a graph neural network (GNN) version of the Learning under Privileged Information paradigm to predict new disease gene associations. Unlike previous gene prioritization approaches, our model does not require the genetic features to be the same at training and test stages. If a genetic feature is hard to measure and therefore missing at the test stage, our model could still efficiently incorporate its information during the training process. To implement this, we develop a Heteroscedastic Gaussian Dropout algorithm, where the dropout probability of the GNN model is determined by another GNN model with a mirrored GNN architecture. To evaluate our method, we compared our method with four state-of-the-art methods on the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man dataset to prioritize candidate disease genes. Extensive evaluations show that our model could improve the prediction accuracy when all the features are available compared to other methods. More importantly, our model could make very accurate predictions when >90% of the features are missing at the test stage. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our method is realized with Python 3.7 and Pytorch 1.5.0 and method and data are freely available at: https://github.com/juanshu30/Disease-Gene-Prioritization-with-Privileged-Information-and-Heteroscedastic-Dropout.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID34252957
PMCPMC8275341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.