Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34252863›Full record

SynthesisJournal of affective disorders2021

Self-report depression screening measures for older Hispanic/Latin American adults: A PRISMA systematic review.

Andrea Ochoa Lopez, Michelle N Martinez, Joshua M Garcia, Mark E Kunik, Luis D Medina

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of affective disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Neural embedding of frailty in cognitively unimpaired aging and dementia across Latin America.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Depression Symptoms Moderate Associations between Daily Functioning and Neuropsychological Performance in Mexican American Adults.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea Ochoa LopezDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Michelle N MartinezDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Joshua M GarciaDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Mark E KunikDepartment of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Luis D MedinaDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States. Electronic address: LDMedina2@uh.edu.
University of Houston · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

The Engaging Communities of Hispanics for Aging Research (ECHAR) NetworkR24AG065170 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI MEDINA, LUIS D · 2020 to 2022
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS R24 AG065170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing depression symptoms in Hispanic/Latin American (H/Ls) older adults, a group at high risk for depression, is nuanced due to the influence of cultural characteristics in symptom expression and manifestation. Little is known about the psychometric properties of available measures when used with this population.

methodsWe conducted a two-stage systematic review of available depression assessment tools. We first identified self-report measures designed for use with adults. We then identified studies where at least one of such measures was used with older H/Ls that reported psychometric properties for the measure(s) used.

resultsOnly 3 measures were identified for use with older H/Ls: the BDI, GDS, and CES-D. However, few data were found to support the validity of the BDI, and the CES-D was not consistently valid across cultural groups. The GDS was found appropriate, though its performance varied based on race/ethnicity, nationality, and cutoff scores. The CES-D and GDS also demonstrated varying psychometric properties based on study setting (research versus clinical) and target population (inpatient psychiatric patients versus community-dwelling individuals). LIMITATIONS: The number of articles that met criteria for inclusion in our review was small, and there was variation among samples of the few studies included.

conclusionsCurrently available self-report depression screening measures have acceptable applicability among older H/Ls, but their utility may vary based on their intended use. Modified cutoff scores may be beneficial in maximizing the utility of these measures when given to diverse older adults.

Indexed as

DepressionHispanic or LatinoAgedHumansLatin AmericaPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportAgingDepressionHispanic AmericansOutcome assessmentpsychometricsSelf-report

Identifiers

PMID34252863
PMCPMC8410643
OpenAlexW3176858543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.