ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2021
Axial flap for giant basal cell carcinoma of the anterior chest wall: Case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceAnterior chest wall Giant Basal Cell Carcinoma (GBCC) is rare amongst GBCC cases and results in a large defect that is challenging to resect and reconstruct. It requires multidisciplinary approach to prevent recurrence. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old man with giant basal cell carcinoma at the anterior chest wall measuring 10 × 6 cm. Wide resection of 1 cm margin with axial flap was performed to close the defect. The follow-up report stated that the patient was satisfied with the result and there was no recurrence observed. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Review of literatures concludes that GBCC is excised with a minimum of 4-6 mm margin outside the tumor area. The axial IMAP flap is ideal to close the upper chest wall defect because of the better aesthetic outcome compared to other conventional flaps, especially in stable elderly male, patients with noninfected wound. Increased skin laxity and more relaxed skin tension associated with aging allows easier tissue mobilization and transfer to close the defect.
conclusionAxial flap for GBCC in anterior chest wall is ideal, safe, and has the advantage of aesthetic reasons of suitable skin tone, particularly for stable elderly male patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.