Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34252454›Full record

SynthesisBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

Predictive performance of thyromental height for difficult laryngoscopies in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cl Ístenes Cr Ístian de Carvalho, Jayme Marques Santos Neto, Fl Via Augusta de Orange

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expert consensus on difficult airway assessment.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cl Ístenes Cr Ístian de CarvalhoInstituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Department of Post-graduation, Recife, PE, Brazil. Electronic address: clistenescristian@hotmail.com.
Jayme Marques Santos NetoUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Hospital das Cl.ínicas, Department of Anesthesia, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Fl Via Augusta de OrangeInstituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Department of Post-graduation, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira · BRHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThyromental height (TMH) was first reported as a great single test for prediction of difficult laryngoscopies, although further studies have shown variable estimates of its accuracy. We thus performed this meta-analysis to summarize the predictive values of TMH mainly for prediction of difficult laryngoscopies.

methodsA search in PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, and Scielo was conducted in June 2020. We included prospective cohorts fully reported with patients ... 16 years old, providing data on predictive values of TMH for prediction of either difficult laryngoscopies or difficult intubations. Diagnostic properties and association between TMH and Cormack and Lehanes...s classification by direct laryngoscopy were evaluated. A random-effects meta-analysis using hierarchical models was performed.

resultsEight studies evaluating 2844 patients were included. All included studies had high risk of bias and low concern regarding applicability. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios were as follows: DOR, 57.94 (95% CI: 18.19...184.55); LR+, 11.32 (95% CI: 4.28...29.92); and LR-, 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15...0.35). Summary sensitivity and specificity for studies with common threshold were 82.6 (95% CI: 74...88.8%) and 93.5 (95% CI: 79...98.2%), respectively. The estimated AUC was 81.1%.

conclusionTMH arises as a good predictor of difficult laryngoscopies in adult patients from diverse populations presenting better predictive values than most previously reported bedside tests. However, the high risk of bias throughout the studies may have skewed the results of the individual research as well as the summary points of the present meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopyAdolescentAdultHumansProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAirway managementIntubation, intratrachealLaryngoscopyMeta-analysisSensitivity and specificitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34252454
PMCPMC10362459
OpenAlexW3180732224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.