Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34252244›Full record

ArticleMycoses2021

Serum Lateral Flow assay with digital reader for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: A two-centre mixed cohort study.

Martin Hoenigl, Matthias Egger, Johannes Boyer, Eduard Schulz, Juergen Prattes, Jeffrey D Jenks

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Mycoses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin HoeniglDivision of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1653-2824
Matthias EggerDivision of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Johannes BoyerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Eduard SchulzDivision of Hematology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Juergen PrattesDivision of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-9311
Jeffrey D JenksDivision of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6632-9587
Medical University of Graz · ATUniversity of California System · USUniversity of San Diego · US

Funding

UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S, HOGARTH, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2024
$88.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001442NIH HHS UL1TR001442Pfizer 60278533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetection of galactomannan (GM) from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) or serum is broadly used for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA), although the sensitivity of GM from serum is lower in non-neutropenic patients. We evaluated the Aspergillus galactomannan Lateral Flow assay (LFA) with digital readout from serum in a mixed cohort of patients.

methodsWe performed a retrospective two-centre study evaluating the LFA from serum of patients with clinical suspicion of IA obtained between 2015 and 2021 at the University of California San Diego and the Medical University of Graz. The sensitivity and specificity was calculated for proven/probable aspergillosis versus no aspergillosis. Correlation with same-sample GM was calculated using Spearman correlation analysis and kappa statistics.

resultsIn total, 122 serum samples from 122 patients were analysed, including proven IA (n = 1), probable IA or coronavirus-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) (n = 27), and no IA/CAPA/non-classifiable (n = 94). At a 0.5 ODI cut-off, the sensitivity and specificity of the LFA was 78.6% and 80.5%. Spearman correlation analysis showed a strong correlation between serum LFA ODI and serum GM ODI (ρ 0.459, p < .0001). Kappa was 0.611 when both LFA and GM were used with a 0.5 ODI cut-off, showing substantial agreement (p < .001). DISCUSSION: The LFA with digital read out from serum showed good performance for the diagnosis of probable/proven aspergillosis, with substantial agreement to GM from serum. Like the LFA from BALF, the LFA from serum may serve as a more rapid test compared to conventional GM, particularly in settings where GM is not readily available.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, FungalAspergillusAutomation, LaboratoryBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleGalactoseHumansImmunoassayInvasive Pulmonary AspergillosisMaleMannansMiddle AgedAntigens, FungalgalactomannanGalactoseMannansAspergillus galactomannan Lateral Flow assay (LFA)COVID-19galactomannanhaematologic malignancyHIVintensive care unitrespiratory diseasesSARS-CoV2serumsolid organ transplant recipients

Identifiers

PMID34252244
PMCPMC8518476
OpenAlexW3181129173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.