Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34252171›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Tracing the spatial imprint of Oldowan technological behaviors: A view from DS (Bed I, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania).

Fernando Diez-Martín, Lucía Cobo-Sánchez, Adrian Baddeley, David Uribelarrea, Audax Mabulla, Enrique Baquedano, Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Fernando Diez-MartínDepartment of Prehistory and Archeology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-362X
Lucía Cobo-SánchezInstitute of Archaeology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4628-2536
Adrian BaddeleySchool of Electrical Engineering, Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
David UribelarreaDepartment of Geodynamics, Stratigraphy and Paleontology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Audax MabullaDepartment of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Enrique BaquedanoInstitute of Evolution in Africa (IDEA), University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Domínguez-RodrigoInstitute of Evolution in Africa (IDEA), University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad de Alcalá · ESCurtin University · AUUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Valladolid · ESUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Dar es Salaam · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DS (David's site) is one of the new archaeological sites documented in the same paleolandscape in which FLK 22 was deposited at about 1.85 Ma in Olduvai Gorge. Fieldwork in DS has unearthed the largest vertically-discrete archaeological horizon in the African Pleistocene, where a multi-cluster anthropogenic accumulation of fossil bones and stone tools has been identified. In this work we present the results of the techno-economic study of the lithic assemblage recovered from DS. We also explore the spatial magnitude of the technological behaviors documented at this spot using powerful spatial statistical tools to unravel correlations between the spatial distributional patterns of lithic categories. At DS, lavas and quartzite were involved in different technological processes. Volcanic materials, probably transported to this spot from a close source, were introduced in large numbers, including unmodified materials, and used in percussion activities and in a wide variety of reduction strategies. A number of volcanic products were subject to outward fluxes to other parts of the paleolandscape. In contrast, quartzite rocks were introduced in smaller numbers and might have been subject to a significantly more intense exploitation. The intra-site spatial analysis has shown that specialized areas cannot be identified, unmodified materials are not randomly distributed, percussion and knapping categories do not spatially overlap, while bipolar specimens show some sort of spatial correlation with percussion activities.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyPaleontologyTanzania

Identifiers

PMID34252171
PMCPMC8274881
OpenAlexW3180744849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.