ArticlePloS one2021
Insights into the influence of cell concentration in design and development of microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) process.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) as a Sustainable Technology, Mechanism and Application: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Solidification Performance and Mechanism of TSC Composite Soil Based on Microbially Induced Mineralization.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Calcium sulphate-based soybean salting-out urease purification for enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation in road base stabilisation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A novel microbial dissolution-reprecipitation pathway for bio-sintering of limestone for biocement production.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Microbial factors behind struvite precipitation: enzymes and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) as key players.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Research on MICP Restoration Technology for Earthen City Walls Damaged by Primary Vegetation Capping in China.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Unveiling the role of microbial rease in ureolysis-induced calcium carbonate precipitation, Its mechanistic insights, and emerging applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Exploration of ureolytic airborne bacteria for biocementation applications from different climate zones in Japan.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Strengthening biopolymer adhesives through ureolysis-induced calcium carbonate precipitation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Beyond carbonate biomineralization: why prokaryote-driven COFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Assessment of the Composition Effect of a Bio-Cementation Solution on the Efficiency of Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation Processes in Loose Sandy Soil.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Optimization of deposition process for a productive and cohesive bio-CaCOApplied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Microbially mediated fossil concretions and their characterization by the latest methodologies: a review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Highlighting Bacteria with Calcifying Abilities Suitable to Improve Mortar Properties.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Research status and development of microbial induced calcium carbonate mineralization technology.PloS one · 2022Article
- A critical review on microbial carbonate precipitation via denitrification process in building materials.Bioengineered · 2021Review
- Influence of native ureolytic microbial community on biocementation potential of Sporosarcina pasteurii.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) process utilising the biogeochemical reactions for low energy cementation has recently emerged as a potential technology for numerous engineering applications. The design and development of an efficient MICP process depends upon several physicochemical and biological variables; amongst which the initial bacterial cell concentration is a major factor. The goal of this study is to assess the impact of initial bacterial cell concentration on ureolysis and carbonate precipitation kinetics along with its influence on the calcium carbonate crystal properties; as all these factors determine the efficacy of this process for specific engineering applications. We have also investigated the role of subsequent cell recharge in calcium carbonate precipitation kinetics for the first time. Experimental results showed that the kinetics of ureolysis and calcium carbonate precipitation are well-fitted by an exponential logistic equation for cell concentrations between optical density range of 0.1 OD to 0.4 OD. This equation is highly applicable for designing the optimal processes for microbially cemented soil stabilization applications using native or augmented bacterial cultures. Multiple recharge kinetics study revealed that the addition of fresh bacterial cells is an essential step to keep the fast rate of precipitation, as desirable in certain applications. Our results of calcium carbonate crystal morphology and mineralogy via scanning electron micrography, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis exhibited a notable impact of cell number and extracellular urease concentration on the properties of carbonate crystals. Lower cell numbers led to formation of larger crystals compared to high cell numbers and these crystals transform from vaterite phase to the calcite phase over time. This study has demonstrated the significance of kinetic models for designing large-scale MICP applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.