SynthesisPloS one2021
A meta-analysis of effects of dietary seaweed on beef and dairy cattle performance and methane yield.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drinking water intake in feedlot cattle: a meta-analysis.Journal of animal science · 2026Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of flavonoids use into beef and dairy cattle diet: Performance, antioxidant status, ruminal fermentation, meat quality, and milk composition.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Pooled it
- Dietary high-purity tribromoethanol (TBE) supplementation reduces enteric methane emissions in beef cattle.Translational animal science · 2026Article
- Advancing methane mitigation in ruminants through feed additive combinations: efficacy, interactions, and implementation challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Mitigating enteric methane emissions: An overview of methanogenesis, inhibitors and future prospects.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025Review
- Effects of dietary supplementation with linseed oil, Ascophyllum nodosum or treated A. nodosum on animal performance, gaseous emissions, ruminal fermentation and microbiota, and meat quality in growing dairy-beef bulls.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Environmental sustainability and ruminant production: A UK veterinary perspective.The Veterinary record · 2024Review
- Effects of Brown Seaweed (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Two Species of Macroalgae from Azores Sea as Potential Reducers of Ruminal Methane Production: In Vitro Ruminal Assay.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Quantifying the Impact of Different Dietary Rumen Modulating Strategies on Enteric Methane Emission and Productivity in Ruminant Livestock: A Meta-Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Enteric methane emission reduction potential of natural feed supplements in ewe diets.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Effect of an algae feed additive on reducing enteric methane emissions from cattle.Translational animal science · 2024Article
- Anti-methanogenic potential of seaweeds and seaweed-derived compounds in ruminant feed: current perspectives, risks and future prospects.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Rumen microbial degradation of bromoform from red seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis) and the impact on rumen fermentation and methanogenic archaea.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Dietary Ruminant Enteric Methane Mitigation Strategies: Current Findings, Potential Risks and Applicability.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Harnessing the connectivity of climate change, food systems and diets: Taking action to improve human and planetary health.Anthropocene · 2023Review
- Potential of Seaweeds to Mitigate Production of Greenhouse Gases during Production of Ruminant Proteins.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2023Review
- Galyean appreciation club review: a holistic perspective of the societal relevance of beef production and its impacts on climate change.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Provision of High-Quality Molasses Blocks to Improve Productivity and Address Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Smallholder Cattle and Buffalo: Studies from Lao PDR.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Algae as Feedstuff for Ruminants: A Focus on Single-Cell Species, Opportunistic Use of Algal By-Products and On-Site Production.Microorganisms · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been considerable interest in the use of red seaweed, and in particular Asparagopsis taxiformis, to increase production of cattle and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We hypothesized that feeding seaweed or seaweed derived products would increase beef or dairy cattle performance as indicated by average daily gain (ADG), feed efficiency measures, milk production, and milk constituents, and reduce methane emissions. We used meta-analytical methods to evaluate these hypotheses. A comprehensive search of Google Scholar, Pubmed and ISI Web of Science produced 14 experiments from which 23 comparisons of treatment effects could be evaluated. Red seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis) and brown seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) were the dominant seaweeds used. There were no effects of treatment on ADG or dry matter intake (DMI). While there was an increase in efficiency for feed to gain by 0.38 kg per kg [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.56; P = 0.001] on DerSimonian and Laird (D&L) evaluation, neither outcome was significant using the more rigorous robust regression analysis (P >0.06). The type of seaweed used was not a significant covariable for ADG and DMI, but A. nodosum fed cattle had lesser feed to gains efficiency compared to those fed A. taxiformis. Milk production was increased with treatment on weighted mean difference (WMD; 1.35 ± 0.44 kg/d; P <0.001); however, the SMD of 0.45 was not significant (P = 0.111). Extremely limited data suggest the possibility of increased percentages of milk fat (P = 0.040) and milk protein (P = 0.001) on (D&L) WMD evaluation. The limited data available indicate dietary supplementation with seaweed produced a significant and substantial reduction in methane yield by 5.28 ± 3.5 g/kg DMI (P = 0.003) on D&L WMD evaluation and a D&L SMD of -1.70 (P = 0.001); however, there was marked heterogeneity in the results (I2 > 80%). In one comparison, methane yield was reduced by 97%. We conclude that while there was evidence of potential for benefit from seaweed use to improve production and reduce methane yield more in vivo experiments are required to strengthen the evidence of effect and identify sources of heterogeneity in methane response, while practical applications and potential risks are evaluated for seaweed use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.