ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
Detecting behavioural changes in human movement to inform the spatial scale of interventions against COVID-19.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health beliefs and their relation to household, necessary, and unnecessary contacts across COVID-19 epidemic waves in Taiwan.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Bias in mobility datasets drives divergence in modeled outbreak dynamics.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Human mobility under disasters: a systematic review and framework for equitable and resilient mobility governance.npj natural hazards · 2025Article
- Heterogeneous changes in mobility in response to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 outbreak in Shanghai.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Urban exodus? Understanding human mobility in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic using Meta-Facebook data.Population, space and place · 2023Article
- Sensing dynamic human activity zones using geo-tagged big data in Greater London, UK during the COVID-19 pandemic.PloS one · 2023Article
- Using geospatial social media data for infectious disease studies: a systematic review.International journal of digital earth · 2023Article
- Application of CCTV Methodology to Analyze COVID-19 Evolution in Italy.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2022Article
- Changes in social contacts in England during the COVID-19 pandemic between March 2020 and March 2021 as measured by the CoMix survey: A repeated cross-sectional study.PLoS medicine · 2022Article
- A sliding window approach to optimize the time-varying parameters of a spatially-explicit and stochastic model of COVID-19.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Mobility and Policy Responses During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020.International journal of public health · 2022Article
- Association between mobility, non-pharmaceutical interventions, and COVID-19 transmission in Ghana: A modelling study using mobile phone data.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Domestic and international mobility trends in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of facebook data.International journal of health geographics · 2021Article
- Interrogating structural inequalities in COVID-19 mortality in England and Wales.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2021Article
- Association between mobility, non-pharmaceutical interventions, and COVID-19 transmission in Ghana: a modelling study using mobile phone data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- How Mobility and Sociality Reshape the Context: A Decade of Experience in Mobile CrowdSensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Disparities in the Evolution of the COVID-19 Pandemic between Spanish Provinces.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
On March 23 2020, the UK enacted an intensive, nationwide lockdown to mitigate transmission of COVID-19. As restrictions began to ease, more localized interventions were used to target resurgences in transmission. Understanding the spatial scale of networks of human interaction, and how these networks change over time, is critical to targeting interventions at the most at-risk areas without unnecessarily restricting areas at low risk of resurgence. We use detailed human mobility data aggregated from Facebook users to determine how the spatially-explicit network of movements changed before and during the lockdown period, in response to the easing of restrictions, and to the introduction of locally-targeted interventions. We also apply community detection techniques to the weighted, directed network of movements to identify geographically-explicit movement communities and measure the evolution of these community structures through time. We found that the mobility network became more sparse and the number of mobility communities decreased under the national lockdown, a change that disproportionately affected long distance connections central to the mobility network. We also found that the community structure of areas in which locally-targeted interventions were implemented following epidemic resurgence did not show reorganization of community structure but did show small decreases in indicators of travel outside of local areas. We propose that communities detected using Facebook or other mobility data be used to assess the impact of spatially-targeted restrictions and may inform policymakers about the spatial extent of human movement patterns in the UK. These data are available in near real-time, allowing quantification of changes in the distribution of the population across the UK, as well as changes in travel patterns to inform our understanding of the impact of geographically-targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.