ArticleCancer research2021
Contemporary Lung Cancer Screening and the Promise of Blood-Based Biomarkers.
Article in Cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fructose-diphosphate aldolase C as a novel diagnostic biomarker for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a low-abundance proteomics study.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Genetic information supports a causal relationship between trace elements, inflammatory proteins, and COPD: evidence from a Mendelian randomization analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a tumor marker-based model for the prediction of lung cancer: an analysis of a multicenter retrospective study in Shanghai, China.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Circulating mitochondrial DNA as a biomarker for lung cancer screening.Translational lung cancer research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this issue, the study by Dagnino and colleagues represents an important addition to the maturing field of blood-based biomarkers for lung cancer screening. Their comprehensive approach to analyzing circulating inflammatory proteins identified CDCP1 as a potential biomarker for distinguishing patients with or without lung cancer, a finding that was confirmed in a validation cohort. CDCP1 blood levels, when combined with smoking history, gave an AUC receiver operator characteristic of 0.75. Analysis of transcripts in peripheral blood cells suggested a Wnt/β-catenin signaling-based mechanism for CDCP1 in tumorigenesis providing biologic plausibility. CDCP1 now joins the ranks of other potential blood-based lung cancer screening biomarkers (including epithelial tumor marker proteins, tumor-associated miRNA, antitumor antibodies, and tumor-specific DNA methylation) that need validation in future clinical trials. Further exploration of how CDCP1 levels might be integrated into current lung cancer screening programs, including both detection of lung cancer, and evaluation of the need for invasive biopsies, as well as how CDCP1 performs in different racial populations, is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.