Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34252034›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2021

Virtual Reality Tour to Reduce Perioperative Anxiety in an Operating Setting Before Anesthesia: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lina Vogt, Martin Klasen, Rolf Rossaint, Ute Goeretz, Peter Ebus, Sasa Sopka

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04579354 nacompletednot on this map

Virtual Reality (VR) Tour to Reduce Preoperative Anxiety Before Anaesthesia in an Operating Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRWTH Aachen UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled84ConditionsAnaesthesia, Anxiety, Postoperative PainArmsvirtual reality tour
NCT07016880 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Virtual Reality Intervention on Preoperative Anxiety, Physiological Parameters and Patient Satisfaction in Women Scheduled for Gynecological Oncology Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsPreoperative Anxiety, Women&#39, s Health, Gynecological CancersArmsVirtual Reality Relaxation Session
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lina VogtAIXTRA Competence Center for Training and Patient Safety, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1913-9083
Martin KlasenAIXTRA Competence Center for Training and Patient Safety, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7823-3013
Rolf RossaintDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7587-1693
Ute GoeretzAIXTRA Competence Center for Training and Patient Safety, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2023-650X
Peter EbusFaculty of Educational Science, Open University, Heerlen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1996-6668
Sasa SopkaAIXTRA Competence Center for Training and Patient Safety, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2165-5578

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerioperative anxiety is a major burden to patients undergoing surgeries with general anesthesia.

objectiveThis study investigated whether a virtual operating room tour (VORT) before surgery can be used to ameliorate perioperative anxiety.

methodsWe employed a randomized parallel-group design with 2 study arms to compare VORT to the standard operation preparation procedure. The study included 84 patients. A validated inventory (state-trait operation anxiety-state) was used to assess perioperative state anxiety before (T1) and after (T2) surgery. In addition, trait operation anxiety was evaluated with an additional validated inventory (state-trait operation anxiety-trait). Moreover, user ratings on the usefulness of VORT were assessed with an evaluation questionnaire. Study arms were compared for perioperative state anxiety with two-tailed independent samples t tests. Subjective ratings were correlated with STOA-Trait values to investigate possible associations between perioperative anxiety with perceived usefulness.

resultsThere were no significant differences in perioperative state anxiety between VORT and standard operation preparation procedures before and after the surgery. Nonetheless, patients' ratings of VORT overall were positive. The tour was perceived as useful and, therefore, showed acceptance for VR use. These ratings were unrelated to the degree of perioperative anxiety.

conclusionsThe subjective benefit of VORT could not be explained by a reduction of perioperative anxiety. Instead, VORT appears to serve the need for information and reduce uncertainty. In addition, VORT is perceived as beneficial regardless of the age of the patients. Considering this effect and the manageable organizational and financial effort toward implementation, the general use of VORT can be recommended.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04579354; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04579354.

Indexed as

Virtual RealityAnesthesia, GeneralAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansOperating Roomsanesthesiaanxietyexposureoperating theaterpatient empowermentperiperative trait anxietySTAISTOAvirtual realityVR

Identifiers

PMID34252034
PMCPMC8444035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.