Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34251887›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Characteristics of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Infancy.

Vijayalakshmi Easwar, Susan Scollie, Michael Lasarev, Matthew Urichuk, Steven J Aiken, David W Purcell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07392164 (Speech-Evoked Auditory Potentials), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07392164 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Speech-Evoked Auditory Potentials: Multisite Pediatric Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorSusan ScollieRan2026 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsHearing ImpairmentArmsA newly developed prototype device for speech-evoked EFR Measurement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vijayalakshmi EaswarDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7944-3012
Susan ScollieNational Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Michael LasarevDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1896-2705
Matthew UrichukSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Steven J AikenSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
David W PurcellNational Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Western University · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Envelope following responses (EFRs) may be a useful tool for evaluating the audibility of speech sounds in infants. The present study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of speech-evoked EFRs in infants with normal hearing, relative to adults, and identify age-dependent changes in EFR characteristics during infancy. In 42 infants and 21 young adults, EFRs were elicited by the first (F1) and the second and higher formants (F2+) of the vowels /u/, /a/, and /i/, dominant in low and mid frequencies, respectively, and by amplitude-modulated fricatives /s/ and /∫/, dominant in high frequencies. In a subset of 20 infants, the in-ear stimulus level was adjusted to match that of an average adult ear (65 dB sound pressure level [SPL]). We found that (a) adult-infant differences in EFR amplitude, signal-to-noise ratio, and intertrial phase coherence were larger and spread across the frequency range when in-ear stimulus level was adjusted in infants, (b) adult-infant differences in EFR characteristics were the largest for low-frequency stimuli, (c) infants demonstrated adult-like phase coherence when they received a higher (i.e., unadjusted) stimulus level, and (d) EFR phase coherence and signal-to-noise ratio changed with age in the first year of life for a few F2+ vowel stimuli in a level-specific manner. Together, our findings reveal that development-related changes in EFRs during infancy likely vary by stimulus frequency, with low-frequency stimuli demonstrating the largest adult-infant differences. Consistent with previous research, our findings emphasize the significant role of stimulus level calibration methods while investigating developmental trends in EFRs.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationHearing TestsHumansInfantPhoneticsYoung Adultcalibrationfrequency following responsefricativephase coherencevowel

Identifiers

PMID34251887
PMCPMC8278440
OpenAlexW3177649813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.