Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34251537›Full record

ArticleHistory and philosophy of the life sciences2021

Cycles and circulation: a theme in the history of biology and medicine.

Nick Hopwood, Staffan Müller-Wille, Janet Browne, Christiane Groeben, Shigehisa Kuriyama, Maaike van der Lugt, Guido Giglioni, Lynn K Nyhart, Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, Ariane Dröscher and 5 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in History and philosophy of the life sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nick HopwoodDepartment of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. ndh12@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7069-7497
Staffan Müller-WilleDepartment of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4929-8373
Janet BrowneDepartment of the History of Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Christiane Groeben, Naples, Italy.
Shigehisa KuriyamaDepartment of East Asian Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Maaike van der LugtUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, DYPAC, Versailles, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1285-0761
Guido GiglioniDipartimento di Studi Umanistici, Università di Macerata, Macerata, Italy.
Lynn K NyhartDepartment of History, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Hans-Jörg RheinbergerMax Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, Germany.
Ariane Dröscher, Bologna, Italy.
Warwick AndersonDepartment of History and the Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2572-035X
Peder AnkerGallatin School, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Mathias GroteInstitut für Geschichtswissenschaften, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lucy van de WielDepartment of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2413-7795
Fifteenth Ischia Summer School on the History of the Life Sciences

Funding

Wellcome Trust 204883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We invite systematic consideration of the metaphors of cycles and circulation as a long-term theme in the history of the life and environmental sciences and medicine. Ubiquitous in ancient religious and philosophical traditions, especially in representing the seasons and the motions of celestial bodies, circles once symbolized perfection. Over the centuries cyclic images in western medicine, natural philosophy, natural history and eventually biology gained independence from cosmology and theology and came to depend less on strictly circular forms. As potent 'canonical icons', cycles also interacted with representations of linear and irreversible change, including arrows, arcs, scales, series and trees, as in theories of the Earth and of evolution. In modern times life cycles and reproductive cycles have often been held to characterize life, in some cases especially female life, while human efforts selectively to foster and disrupt these cycles have harnessed their productivity in medicine and agriculture. But strong cyclic metaphors have continued to link physiology and climatology, medicine and economics, and biology and manufacturing, notably through the relations between land, food and population. From the grand nineteenth-century transformations of matter to systems ecology, the circulation of molecules through organic and inorganic compartments has posed the problem of maintaining identity in the face of flux and highlights the seductive ability of cyclic schemes to imply closure where no original state was in fact restored. More concerted attention to cycles and circulation will enrich analyses of the power of metaphors to naturalize understandings of life and their shaping by practical interests and political imaginations.

Indexed as

History of MedicineBiologyHistory, 15th CenturyHistory, 16th CenturyHistory, 17th CenturyHistory, 18th CenturyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHistory, AncientHistory, MedievalPhilosophyCanonical iconsCirclesDiagramsLife cyclesMetaphorsRecycling

Identifiers

PMID34251537
PMCPMC8275509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.