Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34251512›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

Paying for water in Turkey: an analysis of Turkish water legislation in light of the precedent criteria of the Turkish Constitutional Court.

Yavuz Özhan Türker, Osman Devrim Elvan, Aynur Aydin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yavuz Özhan TürkerJustice Programme, Istanbul Sisli Vocational School, 34394, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey. yavuzozhan.turker@sisli.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8518-0669
Osman Devrim ElvanDepartment of Environment and Forestry Law, Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34473, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7751-5916
Aynur AydinDepartment of Environment and Forestry Law, Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34473, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3647-6150

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water, which is a basic need for humans and the natural world, is a limited resource. It is a cyclical element and not a freely traded commodity. The right to access to water is acknowledged as a basic right because of the importance of water for human life, and for this reason, water is a topic in many human rights texts. The restricted availability of this global resource, which must be sustainable to maintain life, has increased its importance for countries and made its fair and just management necessary. Putting the proper methods into practice is a lot harder than it appears, however, because theories and practices did not sit well together from different perspectives and different ones were developed worldwide. These approaches vary according to countries' access to water, amount of water usage, level of development, and economic situation. Because of these variables, a number of international studies have been carried out to eliminate the strain on water resources. The focus of these studies is on the definition of water resources and the rights and principles of usage and ownership of water. This study views water as a commercial commodity, and its subject is the pricing strategies for water and the underlying legal basis of the acknowledgement of water resources in Turkey as a public asset.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringWaterHuman RightsHumansOwnershipTurkeyWaterConstitutional lawPaying for waterWater rights

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.