Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34251504›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021

[The domain "social processes" in the system of research domain criteria: current state and perspectives].

Peter Praus, Edda Bilek, Nathalie E Holz, Urs Braun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter PrausZentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Edda BilekZentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Nathalie E HolzZentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Urs BraunZentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Deutschland. urs.braun@zi-mannheim.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social processes and their dysfunction, e.g. in autism spectrum disorders and psychotic disorders, have always been at the core of psychiatry. The last decades have led to impressive advances in our understanding of the underlying neurobiological mechanisms and also in the way we study and analyze social processes. Since their establishment, the research domain criteria have provided a powerful framework of how to operationalize and subdivide complex social processes in a way that it closely aligns to underlying neurobiological substrates while still enabling clinical approaches. In this article we summarize and discuss the most important findings for each of the four fundamental constructs of the social processes domain (a) binding and attachment, (b) social communication, (c) perception and understanding of self and (d) perception and understanding of others. We highlight the clinical relevance of the insights generated by the field of social neurosciences and discuss the resulting increasing importance of transdiagnostic concepts in applied research. Finally, we showcase three innovative research methods that build on the accelerating technological advances of the last decade and which will increasingly enable the study of complex social interactions in more realistic and ecologically valid settings.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderPsychiatryPsychotic DisordersHumansMobile sensor systemsPerception and understandingSocial interactionSocial neurosciencesTransdiagnostics

Identifiers

PMID34251504
PMCPMC8273369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.