ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021
[The domain "social processes" in the system of research domain criteria: current state and perspectives].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neurostructural traces of early life adversities: A meta-analysis exploring age- and adversity-specific effects.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022Pooled it
- The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) domains positive valence system, negative valence system, cognitive systems, and social processes and their relationship with stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in a university student sample.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The associations of Positive and Negative Valence Systems, Cognitive Systems and Social Processes on disease severity in anxiety and depressive disorders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social processes and their dysfunction, e.g. in autism spectrum disorders and psychotic disorders, have always been at the core of psychiatry. The last decades have led to impressive advances in our understanding of the underlying neurobiological mechanisms and also in the way we study and analyze social processes. Since their establishment, the research domain criteria have provided a powerful framework of how to operationalize and subdivide complex social processes in a way that it closely aligns to underlying neurobiological substrates while still enabling clinical approaches. In this article we summarize and discuss the most important findings for each of the four fundamental constructs of the social processes domain (a) binding and attachment, (b) social communication, (c) perception and understanding of self and (d) perception and understanding of others. We highlight the clinical relevance of the insights generated by the field of social neurosciences and discuss the resulting increasing importance of transdiagnostic concepts in applied research. Finally, we showcase three innovative research methods that build on the accelerating technological advances of the last decade and which will increasingly enable the study of complex social interactions in more realistic and ecologically valid settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.