ArticleNeuroradiology2022
Ultrasonic characteristics of carotid webs.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carotid web ultrasonography and its associations with ischemic stroke: a preliminary observational study.BMC neurology · 2025Observational
- Operative Procedures for Ultrasound Assessment of Extracranial Artery Disease: A Narrative Review by the Italian Society for Vascular Investigation (SIDV).Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The differences between carotid web and carotid web with plaque: based on multimodal ultrasonic and clinical characteristics.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- New asymptomatic thrombosis caused by carotid web during the acute period of cerebral infarction.BMC neurology · 2023Article
- Symptomatic atherosclerotic plaque accompanied by carotid web.The neuroradiology journal · 2023Article
- The carotid web: Current research status and imaging features.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Ultrasound characteristics of carotid web.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022Article
- The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Carotid Web.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Multimodal ultrasound-based morphological differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid web.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to retrospectively analyze the ultrasonographic images of 46 cases of carotid web (CW) and summarize their manifestations to reduce the rate of misdiagnosis.
methodsFor the analysis of ultrasonic manifestations, 46 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CW by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and CT angiography (CTA) in our hospital from January 2015 to October 2020 were collected. The location and the morphology of CW, the presence of a plaque at the base and thrombus at the surrounding of the CW, and whether they resulted in arteriostenosis were discussed.
resultsThe average age of 46 patients was 43.23 ± 4.89 years old and there were 18 males and 28 females. Fifteen patients were admitted with cerebral infarction. The CW was located at the initial segment of the internal carotid artery in 22 cases, the bifurcation of the carotid artery in 20 cases, and the common carotid artery in 4 cases. CW in 5 patients was longer than half of the artery diameter, two patients with "cliff-like" arteriostenosis, 29 patients with plaques, and 16 patients with thrombi. The CW grew in the direction of the blood flow without obvious fluttering. The CW has a higher display rate on the ultrasound longitudinal section than the transverse section.
conclusionWe identified some typical ultrasound characteristics of CW. Recognizing them will improve diagnostic accuracy of CW by ultrasonography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.