ReviewDer Radiologe2021
[Spontaneous craniocervical dissection].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Craniocervical dissection].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- [Ultrasound of the neck].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- The roles and mechanisms of miR-26 derived from exosomes of adipose-derived stem cells in the formation of carotid atherosclerotic plaque.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous craniocervical dissection is one of the main causes of stroke in juvenile and middle-aged patients. It is caused by intramural hematoma which may result in stenosis or even occlusion of the artery. Clinical manifestation varies from local pain to ischemic complications. The imaging modality of choice is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which is able to detect all characteristic signs of dissection. Intramural hematoma is detected with thin slice fat-saturated 3D black-blood images. However, with the use of special imaging techniques, questionable findings can be clarified and especially the more difficult to detect intradural dissection can be accurately diagnosed. Acute treatment depends on the severity of neurological symptoms and their duration. Factors like the location of the dissection, cerebral infarction or hemorrhage influence the choice of medication for primary and secondary prophylaxis. Resorption of the intramural hematoma often leads to spontaneous recanalization within a few months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.