Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34251478›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2021

[Quality in sports orthopedics and traumatology: more than just return to play].

Wolf Petersen, Sebastian Bierke, Martin Häner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wolf PetersenKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Martin Luther Krankenhaus Berlin, Caspar Teysstraße 27-31, 14193, Berlin, Deutschland. wolf.petersen@jsd.de.
Sebastian BierkeKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Martin Luther Krankenhaus Berlin, Caspar Teysstraße 27-31, 14193, Berlin, Deutschland.
Martin HänerKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Martin Luther Krankenhaus Berlin, Caspar Teysstraße 27-31, 14193, Berlin, Deutschland.
Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality assessment is gaining in importance in sports orthopedics and traumatology. Structural, process and results quality are differentiated as central quality dimensions in healthcare. Structural quality is understood to mean the capabilities of the institution involved in patient care with its human and material resources. Structural quality can be documented using institutional certificates (e.g. knee center of the German Knee Society, DKG) or personal certificates (e.g. DKG knee surgeon). Process quality evaluates all medical, nursing and administrative activities that are involved in the care process. The outcome quality describes changes in the patient's state of health that can be attributed to medical, nursing and physiotherapeutic measures. The measurement of the outcome quality can be broken down into objective and subjective parameters. In terms of subjective parameters patient reported outcome measures (PROM) play a major role. Another quality initiative in recent years can be seen in healthcare research. In this context medical registers play a role in which long-term healthcare data are prospectively collated and involves data on the quality of the process and outcome. The outcome quality is also the focus of value-based reimbursement systems.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsSurgeonsTraumatologyHumansReturn to SportOutcome qualityProcess qualityRegistryStructural qualityValue-based remuneration models

Identifiers

PMID34251478
OpenAlexW3182476345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.