Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34251028›Full record

GuidelineAnaesthesia2021

Ergonomics in the anaesthetic workplace: Guideline from the Association of Anaesthetists.

C R Bailey, S Radhakrishna, K Asanati, N Dill, K Hodgson, C McKeown, A Pawa, F Plaat, A Wilkes

Open access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ergonomics of bronchoscopy: good advice or a pain in the neck?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

C R BaileyDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Council Member, Association of Anaesthetists and Co-Chair of the Working Party, London, UK.
S RadhakrishnaDepartment of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire, Difficult Airway Society representative and Co-Chair of the Working Party, Coventry, UK.
K AsanatiImperial College London, London, UK.
N DillThe Association for Anaesthetic and Respiratory Device Suppliers, Bromley, UK.
K HodgsonSouth East Scotland School of Anaesthesia, Member of the Association of Anaesthetists Training Committee, UK.
C McKeownLink Ergonomics, Nottingham, UK.
A PawaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, President of Regional Anaesthesia (RA) UK, London, UK.
F PlaatDepartment of Anaesthesia, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Council Member, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.
A WilkesMedical Devices, Edinburgh, UK.
Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBRoyal College of Anaesthetists · GBUniversity Hospital Coventry · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ergonomics in relation to anaesthesia is the scientific study of the interaction between anaesthetists and their workspace environment in order to promote safety, performance and well-being. The foundation for avoiding pain or discomfort at work is to adopt and maintain a good posture, whether sitting or standing. Anaesthetists should aim to keep their posture as natural and neutral as possible. The successful practice of anaesthesia relies on optimisation of ergonomics and lack of attention to detail in this area is associated with impaired performance. The anaesthetic team should wear comfortable clothing, including appropriately-sized personal protective equipment where necessary. Temperature, humidity and light should be adequate at all times. The team should comply with infection prevention and control guidelines and monitoring as recommended by the Association of Anaesthetists. Any equipment or machinery that is mobile should be positioned where it is easy to view or reach without having to change the body or head position significantly when interacting with it. Patients who are supine should, whenever possible, be raised upwards to limit the need to lean towards them. Any item required during a procedure should be positioned on trays or trolleys that are close to the dominant hand. Pregnancy affects the requirements for standing, manually handling, applying force when operating equipment or moving machines and the period over which the individual might have to work without a break. Employers have a duty to make reasonable adjustments to accommodate disability in the workplace. Any member of staff with a physical impairment needs to be accommodated and this includes making provision for a wheelchair user who needs to enter the operating theatre and perform their work.

Indexed as

WorkplaceAirway ExtubationAnesthesia, GeneralErgonomicsHumansHumidityIntensive Care UnitsIntubation, IntratrachealLightingPatient SafetyPersonal Protective EquipmentTemperatureergonomicsmanual handlingmusculoskeletal injuries

Identifiers

PMID34251028
PMCPMC9292255
OpenAlexW3181995894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.