Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34250759›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Antibiotic use influences outcomes in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.

Chirayu Mohindroo, Merve Hasanov, Jane E Rogers, Wenli Dong, Laura R Prakash, Seyda Baydogan, Jonathan D Mizrahi, Michael J Overman, Gauri R Varadhachary, Robert A Wolff and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Microbiota in cancer: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chirayu MohindrooDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Merve HasanovDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6102-4917
Jane E RogersPharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7275-7008
Wenli DongDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Laura R PrakashDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Seyda BaydoganDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jonathan D MizrahiDepartment of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael J OvermanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Gauri R VaradhacharyDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Robert A WolffDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Milind M JavleDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
David R FogelmanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael T LotzeDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael P KimDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Matthew H G KatzDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3870-6968
Shubham PantDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ching-Wei D TzengDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Florencia McAllisterDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9915-0943
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

TRAINING FOR ACADEMIC ONCOLOGY/HEMATOLOGYT32CA009666 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Michael Davies, Courtney DiNardo · 1994 to 2026
$9.8M
AGA FoundationCancer Prevention and Research Institute of TexasNCI NIH HHS T32 CA009666Sabin Family FoundationV Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies defined a potentially important role of the microbiome in modulating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and responses to therapies. We hypothesized that antibiotic usage may predict outcomes in patients with PDAC. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of patients with resectable or metastatic PDAC seen at MD Anderson Cancer from 2003 to 2017. Demographic, chemotherapy regimen and antibiotic use, duration, type, and reason for indication were recorded. A total of 580 patients with PDAC were studied, 342 resected and 238 metastatic patients, selected retrospectively from our database. Antibiotic use, for longer than 48 hrs, was detected in 209 resected patients (61%) and 195 metastatic ones (62%). On resectable patients, we did not find differences in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), based on antibiotic intake. However, in the metastatic cohort, antibiotic consumption was associated with a significantly longer OS (13.3 months vs. 9.0 months, HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.7, p = 0.0001) and PFS (4.4 months vs. 2 months, HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.68, p = <0.0001). In multivariate analysis, the impact of ATB remained significant for PFS (HR 0.59, p = 0.005) and borderline statistically significant for OS (HR 0.69, p = 0.06). When we analyzed by chemotherapy regimen, we found that patients who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy (n = 118) had significantly prolonged OS (HR 0.4, p 0.0013) and PFS (HR 0.55, p 0.02) if they received antibiotics, while those receiving 5FU-based chemotherapy (n = 98) had only prolonged PFS (HR 0.54, p = 0.03). Antibiotics-associated modulation of the microbiome is associated with better outcomes in patients with metastatic PDAC.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsProgression-Free SurvivalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDeoxycytidineEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleFluorouracilGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGemcitabineHumansMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineantibioticsautophagychemotherapeutic agentsimmunitymicrobiotapancreatic adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID34250759
PMCPMC8335807
OpenAlexW3178490306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.