ArticleSociology of health & illness2021
Frying eggs or making a treatment plan? Frictions between different modes of caring in a community mental health team.
Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Caregivers' Phase-Specific Roles in Integrating Digital Technologies in Chinese Nursing Homes: Qualitative Ethnographic Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Delivery and delay of guideline pharmacological, psychological, and social interventions for adults with complex psychosis in Dutch inpatient rehabilitation units: A retrospective study.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2026Article
- Needs of the network: a qualitative study of the needs of family members, partners and close friends of people with a severe mental illness (SMI).BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Perspective matters in recovery: the views of persons with severe mental illness, family and mental health professionals on collaboration during recovery, a qualitative study.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Place-Based FACT: Treatment Outcomes and Patients' Experience with Integrated Neighborhood-Based Care.Community mental health journal · 2024Article
- Relational practice in health, education, criminal justice, and social care: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Vital Needs of Dutch Homeless Service Users: Responsiveness of Local Services in the Light of Health Equity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- An observational comparison of FACT and ACT in the Netherlands and the US.BMC psychiatry · 2022Observational
- Frying eggs or making a treatment plan? Frictions between different modes of caring in a community mental health team.Sociology of health & illness · 2021Article
- "Caring for a Crisis": Care and Control in Community Mental Health.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- The Integration of Flexible Assertive Community Treatment with District Social Support Service Teams for Patients with Severe Mental Illness in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Analysis of Team Members' Experiences.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, we conduct an empirical ethics approach to unravel the different perspectives on good care that are present in a community mental health team (CMHT) in Utrecht. With the deinstitutionalisation of mental health care, the importance of a close collaboration between the social and medical domains of care on the level of the local community is put in the foreground. Next to organisational thresholds or incentives, this collaboration is shaped by different notions of what good mental health care should entail. Using the concept of modes of ordering care (Moser 2005), we describe five modes of ordering mental health care that are present in the practice of the CMHT: the medical specialist, the juridical, the community, the relational and the bureaucratic perspective. These different modes of ordering care lead to frictions and misunderstandings, but are mutually enhancing at other times. Unravelling these different modes of ordering care can facilitate collaboration between professionals of different care domains and support a mutual understanding of what needs to be done. More so, the analysis foregrounds that ordering care from a relational approach is important in daily practice, but is in need of stronger legitimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.