Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34250560›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of implant dentistry2021

Management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during maxillary sinus floor augmentation with lateral approach in relation to subsequent implant survival rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luis Alfredo Díaz-Olivares, Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann, Natalia Martínez-Rodríguez, José María Martínez-González, Juan López-Quiles, Isabel Leco-Berrocal, Cristina Meniz-García

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of implant dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luis Alfredo Díaz-OlivaresDepartment of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Pza Ramon y Cajal s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Cortés-Bretón BrinkmannDepartment of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Pza Ramon y Cajal s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain. jcortesb@ucm.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-8867
Natalia Martínez-RodríguezDepartment of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Pza Ramon y Cajal s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
José María Martínez-GonzálezDepartment of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Pza Ramon y Cajal s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Juan López-QuilesDepartment of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Pza Ramon y Cajal s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Isabel Leco-BerrocalDepartment of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Pza Ramon y Cajal s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Meniz-GarcíaDepartment of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Pza Ramon y Cajal s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis systematic review aimed to propose a treatment protocol for repairing intraoperative perforation of the Schneiderian membrane during maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) procedures with lateral window technique. In turn, to assess subsequent implant survival rates placed below repaired membranes compared with intact membranes and therefore determine whether membrane perforation constitutes a risk factor for implant survival. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers conducted an electronic search for articles published between 2008 and April 30, 2020, in four databases: (1) The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed) via Ovid; (2) Web of Science (WOS); (3) SCOPUS; and (4) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); also, a complementary handsearch was carried out. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the quality of evidence in the studies reviewed.

resultsSeven articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. A total of 1598 sinus lift surgeries were included, allowing the placement of 3604 implants. A total of 1115 implants were placed under previously perforated and repaired membranes, obtaining a survival rate of 97.68%, while 2495 implants were placed below sinus membranes that were not damaged during surgery, obtaining a survival rate of 98.88%. The rate of Schneiderian membrane perforation shown in the systematic review was 30.6%. In the articles reviewed, the most widely used technique for repairing perforated membranes was collagen membrane repair.

conclusionsSchneiderian membrane perforation during MFSA procedures with lateral approach is not a risk factor for dental implant survival (p=0.229; RR 0.977; 95% CI 0.941-1.015). The knowledge of the exact size of the membrane perforation is essential for deciding on the right treatment plan.

Indexed as

Sinus Floor AugmentationMaxillary SinusNasal MucosaProstheses and ImplantsSurvival RateUnited StatesAlveolar ridge atrophyBone augmentationLateral approachMaxillary sinus floor elevationSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34250560
PMCPMC8273047
OpenAlexW3181378610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.